Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19935678›Full record

ArticleActa pharmacologica Sinica2009

Pharmacophore-based virtual screening versus docking-based virtual screening: a benchmark comparison against eight targets.

Zhi Chen, Hong-lin Li, Qi-jun Zhang, Xiao-guang Bao, Kun-qian Yu, Xiao-min Luo, Wei-liang Zhu, Hua-liang Jiang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Structural Bioinformatics Applied to Acetylcholinesterase Enzyme Inhibition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. InhibitingPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Drug Design-Past, Present, Future.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Discovery of Small Molecules as Membrane-Bound Catechol-Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhi ChenDrug Discovery and Design Center, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Hong-lin Li
Qi-jun Zhang
Xiao-guang Bao
Kun-qian Yu
Xiao-min Luo
Wei-liang Zhu
Hua-liang Jiang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study was conducted to compare the efficiencies of two virtual screening approaches, pharmacophore-based virtual screening (PBVS) and docking-based virtual screening (DBVS) methods.

methodsAll virtual screens were performed on two data sets of small molecules with both actives and decoys against eight structurally diverse protein targets, namely angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), androgen receptor (AR), D-alanyl-D-alanine carboxypeptidase (DacA), dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), estrogen receptors alpha (ERalpha), HIV-1 protease (HIV-pr), and thymidine kinase (TK). Each pharmacophore model was constructed based on several X-ray structures of protein-ligand complexes. Virtual screens were performed using four screening standards, the program Catalyst for PBVS and three docking programs (DOCK, GOLD and Glide) for DBVS.

resultsOf the sixteen sets of virtual screens (one target versus two testing databases), the enrichment factors of fourteen cases using the PBVS method were higher than those using DBVS methods. The average hit rates over the eight targets at 2% and 5% of the highest ranks of the entire databases for PBVS are much higher than those for DBVS.

conclusionThe PBVS method outperformed DBVS methods in retrieving actives from the databases in our tested targets, and is a powerful method in drug discovery.

Indexed as

Drug DesignSoftwareAnimalsCrystallography, X-RayDatabases, FactualHIV-1HumansLigandsModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationProtein BindingProteinsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID19935678
PMCPMC4007494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.