Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19934366›Full record

ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2009

Brucella melitensis, B. neotomae and B. ovis elicit common and distinctive macrophage defense transcriptional responses.

Jill Covert, Angela J Mathison, Linda Eskra, Menachem Banai, Gary Splitter

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  7. Transcriptome analysis ofAccess microbiology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. TheThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2017
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jill CovertUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, 1656 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Angela J Mathison
Linda Eskra
Menachem Banai
Gary Splitter
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Vaccines and Therapies Against BotulismU54AI057153 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KANABROCKI, JOSEPH A. · 2003 to 2013
$87.6M
Brucella epitope recognition by CD8+ T cellsR01AI073558 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HARMS, JEROME SCOTT, SMITH, JUDITH ANNE · 2008 to 2016
$3.3M
Genomic Island-5 in Brucella PathogenesisR21AI070229 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SPLITTER, GARY A · 2006 to 2007
$397k
NIAID NIH HHS 1-U54-AI-057153NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI073558NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI070229NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucella spp. establish an intracellular replicative niche in macrophages, while macrophages attempt to eliminate the bacteria by innate defense mechanisms. Brucella spp. possess similar genomes yet exhibit different macrophage infections. Few B. melitensis and B. neotomae enter macrophages with intracellular adaptation occurring over 4-8 hr. Conversely, B. ovis are readily ingested by macrophages and exhibit a persistent plateau of infection. Evaluating early macrophage interaction with Brucella spp. allows discovery of host entry and intracellular translocation mechanisms. Microarray analysis of macrophage transcriptional response following a 4 hr infection by different Brucella spp. revealed common macrophage genes altered in expression compared to uninfected macrophages. Macrophage infection with three different Brucella spp. provokes a common innate immune theme with increased transcript levels of chemokines and defense response genes and decreased transcript levels of GTPase signaling and cytoskeletal function that may affect trafficking of Brucella containing vesicles. For example, transcript levels of genes associated with chemotaxis (IL-1beta, MIP-1alpha), cytokine regulation (Socs3) and defense (Fas, Tnf) were increased, while transcript levels of genes associated with vesicular trafficking (Rab3d) and lysosomal associated enzymes (prosaposin) were decreased. Genes with altered macrophage transcript levels among Brucella spp. infections may correlate with species specific host defenses and intracellular survival strategies. Depending on the infecting Brucella species, gene ontology categorization identified genes differentially involved in cell growth and maintenance, endopeptidase inhibitor activity and G-protein mediated signaling. Examples of decreased gene expression in B. melitensis infection but not other Brucella spp. were growth arrest (Gas2), immunoglobulin receptor (FcgammarI) and chemokine receptor (Cxcr4) genes, suggesting opposing effects on intracellular functions.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAnimalsBrucella melitensisBrucella ovisBrucellosisCell LineChemotaxisCytokinesGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationMacrophagesMiceMicrofilament ProteinsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReceptors, CXCR4Receptors, IgGCxcr4 protein, ratCytokinesFcgr1 protein, mouseGas2 protein, mouseMicrofilament ProteinsReceptors, CXCR4Receptors, IgG

Identifiers

PMID19934366
PMCPMC2880867
OpenAlexW2114908063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.