Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19934335›Full record

ArticleCancer research2009

Prognostic significance of growth kinetics in newly diagnosed glioblastomas revealed by combining serial imaging with a novel biomathematical model.

Christina H Wang, Jason K Rockhill, Maciej Mrugala, Danielle L Peacock, Albert Lai, Katy Jusenius, Joanna M Wardlaw, Timothy Cloughesy, Alexander M Spence, Russ Rockne and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 245 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interval brain imaging for adults with cerebral glioma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. 75 Years of Mathematical Oncology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Knowledge-Informed Machine Learning for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Review.IEEE transactions on automation science and engineering : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Tissue stresses caused by invasive tumour: a biomechanical model.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina H WangDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Jason K Rockhill
Maciej Mrugala
Danielle L Peacock
Albert Lai
Katy Jusenius
Joanna M Wardlaw
Timothy Cloughesy
Alexander M Spence
Russ Rockne
Ellsworth C Alvord
Kristin R Swanson
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Edinburgh · GBWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

Novel Tools for Evaluation and Prediction of Radiotherapy Response in IndividualR01NS060752 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SWANSON, KRISTIN R · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastomas are the most aggressive primary brain tumors, characterized by their rapid proliferation and diffuse infiltration of the brain tissue. Survival patterns in patients with glioblastoma have been associated with a number of clinicopathologic factors including age and neurologic status, yet a significant quantitative link to in vivo growth kinetics of each glioma has remained elusive. Exploiting a recently developed tool for quantifying glioma net proliferation and invasion rates in individual patients using routinely available magnetic resonance images (MRI), we propose to link these patient-specific kinetic rates of biological aggressiveness to prognostic significance. Using our biologically based mathematical model for glioma growth and invasion, examination of serial pretreatment MRIs of 32 glioblastoma patients allowed quantification of these rates for each patient's tumor. Survival analyses revealed that even when controlling for standard clinical parameters (e.g., age and Karnofsky performance status), these model-defined parameters quantifying biological aggressiveness (net proliferation and invasion rates) were significantly associated with prognosis. One hypothesis generated was that the ratio of the actual survival time after whatever therapies were used to the duration of survival predicted (by the model) without any therapy would provide a therapeutic response index (TRI) of the overall effectiveness of the therapies. The TRI may provide important information, not otherwise available, about the effectiveness of the treatments in individual patients. To our knowledge, this is the first report indicating that dynamic insight from routinely obtained pretreatment imaging may be quantitatively useful in characterizing the survival of individual patients with glioblastoma. Such a hybrid tool bridging mathematical modeling and clinical imaging may allow for stratifying patients for clinical studies relative to their pretreatment biological aggressiveness.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBrain NeoplasmsCell Growth ProcessesGlioblastomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm InvasivenessProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID19934335
PMCPMC3467150
OpenAlexW2071948601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.