Trial reportArchives of internal medicine2009
Physician and pharmacist collaboration to improve blood pressure control.
Trial report in Archives of internal medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 148 papers, 24 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Adherence to Blood Pressure Guidelines
A Coordinated PCP-Cardiologist Telemedicine Model (PCTM) in China's Community Hypertension Care: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Intervention for Self-Management of High Blood Pressure Among Alaska Native People
Who cites it
148 citing papers in PubMed, 24 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pharmacist-integrated collaborative outpatient care for risk factor control across the cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic spectrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Pharmacist interventions to improve hypertension management among patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of patient care teams on blood pressure control in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Pooled it
- Role of Health Care Professionals in the Success of Blood Pressure Control Interventions in Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2024Pooled it
- Involving community pharmacists in interprofessional collaboration in primary care: a systematic review.BMC primary care · 2024Pooled it
- Remote follow-up by pharmacists for blood pressure control in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Interprofessional collaboration in primary care: what effect on patient health? A systematic literature review.BMC primary care · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Team-Based Care for Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis and Simulation Study.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2023Pooled it
- Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical and economic outcomes of hospital pharmaceutical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC health services research · 2020Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Network Studies Based on Administrative Health Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Medication Reviews Conducted by Pharmacists on Cardiovascular Diseases Risk Factors in Ambulatory Care.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Pooled it
- Patient and public perspectives of community pharmacies in the United Kingdom: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Pooled it
- Comparative Effectiveness of Implementation Strategies for Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Annals of internal medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Interventions to improve adherence to cardiovascular disease guidelines: a systematic review.BMC family practice · 2015Pooled it
- Team-based care and improved blood pressure control: a community guide systematic review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2014Pooled it
- Improving blood pressure control through pharmacist interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2014Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient: a systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2012Pooled it
- Review of services provided by pharmacies that promote healthy living.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2012Pooled it
88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies have demonstrated that blood pressure (BP) control can be improved when clinical pharmacists assist with patient management. The objective of this study was to evaluate if a physician and pharmacist collaborative model in community-based medical offices could improve BP control.
methodsThis was a prospective, cluster randomized, controlled clinical trial with clinics randomized to a control group (n = 3) or to an intervention group (n = 3). The study enrolled 402 patients (mean age, 58.3 years) with uncontrolled hypertension. Clinical pharmacists made drug therapy recommendations to physicians based on national guidelines. Research nurses performed BP measurements and 24-hour BP monitoring.
resultsThe mean (SD) guideline adherence scores increased from 49.4 (19.3) at baseline to 53.4 (18.1) at 6 months (8.1% increase) in the control group and from 40.4 (22.6) at baseline to 62.8 (13.5) at 6 months (55.4% increase) in the intervention group (P = .09 for adjusted between-group comparison). The mean BP decreased 6.8/4.5 mm Hg in the control group and 20.7/9.7 mm Hg in the intervention group (P < .05 for between-group systolic BP comparison). The adjusted difference in systolic BP was -12.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], -24.0 to 0.0) mm Hg, while the adjusted difference in diastolic BP was -1.8 (95% CI, -11.9 to 8.3) mm Hg. The 24-hour BP levels showed similar effect sizes. Blood pressure was controlled in 29.9% of patients in the control group and in 63.9% of patients in the intervention group (adjusted odds ratio, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.0-5.1; P < .001).
conclusionsA physician and pharmacist collaborative intervention achieved significantly better mean BP and overall BP control rates compared with a control group. Additional research should be conducted to evaluate efficient strategies to implement team-based chronic disease management.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00201019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.