Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19931663›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2009

Recurrence after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery for esophageal cancer: does the pattern of recurrence differ for patients with complete response and those with partial or no response?

Robert A Meguid, Craig M Hooker, Joshua T Taylor, Laurence R Kleinberg, Stephen M Cattaneo, Marc S Sussman, Stephen C Yang, Richard F Heitmiller, Arlene A Forastiere, Malcolm V Brock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Robert A MeguidDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Craig M Hooker
Joshua T Taylor
Laurence R Kleinberg
Stephen M Cattaneo
Marc S Sussman
Stephen C Yang
Richard F Heitmiller
Arlene A Forastiere
Malcolm V Brock

Funding

ZINC AND CA EDTA THERAPY OF PLUMBISMM01RR000052 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BELCHER, HAROLYN MILLICENT EDITH · 1985 to 2007
$37.3M
Clinical and Laboratory Research Training for Gastrointestinal SurgeonsT32DK007713 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID J HACKAM · 1996 to 2026
$5.2M
CHFR Methylation for Predicting Taxane Sensitivity in Lung and Esophageal CancerR33CA127055 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HERMAN, JAMES G. · 2008 to 2011
$1.1M
Screening for Lung Cancer in the HIV PatientK23CA117820 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BROCK, MALCOLM V · 2005 to 2007
$420k
CHFR Methylation for Predicting Taxane Sensitivity in Lung and Esophageal CancerR21CA127055 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HERMAN, JAMES G. · 2007 to 2007
$230k
NCI NIH HHS K23 CA117820NCI NIH HHS R21 CA127055NCI NIH HHS R33 CA127055NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000052NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe hypothesized that most relapses in patients with esophageal cancer having neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy would occur outside of the surgical and radiation fields.

methodsRecurrence patterns, time to recurrence, and median survival were examined in 267 patients who had esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy at Johns Hopkins over 19 years.

resultsOf 267 patients, 82 (30.7%) showed complete response to neoadjuvant therapy, with 108 (40.4%) and 77 (28.8%) showing partial response or no response, respectively. Recurrence developed in 84 patients (patients with complete response 18/82, 21.4%; patients with partial response 39/108, 36.1%; patients with no response 27/77, 35.1%; P = .055, respectively). Most patients had recurrences at distant sites (65/84;77.4%) regardless of pathologic response, and subsequent survival was brief (median 8.37 months). Median disease-free survival was short (10 months) and did not differ based on recurrence site for patients with partial response or no response, but was longer for patients with complete response with distant recurrence, whose median disease-free survival was 27.3 months (P = .008). By multivariate analysis, no other factor except for pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy was associated with disease recurrence or death. Patients with partial response or no response were 1.97 and 2.23 times more likely to have recurrence than patients with complete response (P = .024 and P = .012, respectively).

conclusionsMost esophageal cancer recurrences after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery are distant, and survival time after recurrence is short regardless of pathologic response. Fewer patients achieving complete response had recurrences, and distant recurrences in these patients manifest later than in patients showing partial response and those showing no response. Only pathologic response is significantly associated with disease recurrence, suggesting that tumor biology and chemosensitivity are critical in long-term patient outcome.

Indexed as

EsophagectomyNeoadjuvant TherapyAgedDisease-Free SurvivalEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, Local

Identifiers

PMID19931663
PMCPMC3654695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.