Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19931238›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2010

Differential contribution of direct-developing and stem cell-derived melanocytes to the zebrafish larval pigment pattern.

Keith A Hultman, Stephen L Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Neural crest development: insights from the zebrafish.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The melanocyte lineage in development and disease.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keith A HultmanDepartment of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8232, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Stephen L Johnson
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

REGULATION OF ADULT STEM CELLS IN ZEBRAFISHR01GM056988 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, STEPHEN L · 1998 to 2016
$6.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056988NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM56988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extent of adult stem cell involvement in embryonic growth is often unclear, as reliable markers or assays for whether a cell is derived from an adult stem cell, such as the melanocyte stem cell (MSC), are typically not available. We have previously shown that two lineages of melanocytes can contribute to the larval zebrafish pigment pattern. The embryo first develops an ontogenetic pattern that is largely composed of ErbB-independent, direct-developing melanocytes. This population can be replaced during regeneration by an ErbB-dependent MSC-derived population following melanocyte ablation. In this study, we developed a melanocyte differentiation assay used together with drugs that ablate the MSC to investigate whether MSC-derived melanocytes contribute to the ontogenetic pattern. We found that essentially all melanocytes that develop before 3 dpf arise from the ErbB-independent, direct-developing population. Similarly, late-developing (after 3 dpf) melanocytes of the head are also ErbB independent. In contrast, the melanocytes that develop after 3 days postfertilization in the lateral and dorsal stripe are sensitive to ErbB inhibitor, indicating that they are derived from the MSC. We show that melanocyte regeneration mutants kit(j1e99) and skiv2l2(j24e1) that are grossly normal for the overall ontogenetic pattern also lack the MSC-derived contribution to the lateral stripe. This result suggests that the underlying regeneration defect of these mutations is a defect in MSC regulation. We suggest that the regulative functions of the MSC may serve quality control roles during larval development, in addition to its established roles in larval regeneration and growth and homeostasis in the adult.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationLarvaMelaninsMelanocytesMutationPhenylthioureaPigmentationQuinazolinesReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesRegenerationStem CellsTime FactorsTyrphostinsZebrafishMelaninsPhenylthioureaQuinazolinesReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesRTKI cpdTyrphostins

Identifiers

PMID19931238
PMCPMC2812685
OpenAlexW1984312558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.