ArticleBMC public health2009
Men and women: beliefs about cancer and about screening.
Article in BMC public health, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lifetime risk for cancer death by sex and smoking status: the lifetime risk pooling project.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2012Pooled it
- Proposal for an annual skin examination by a general practitioner for patients at high risk for melanoma: a French cohort study.BMJ open · 2015Trial
- Targeted melanoma prevention intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial.Annals of family medicineTrial
- Chemotherapy delays among cancer patients in Iran during COVID-19 pandemic.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Sex-specific differences in colorectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Fatalistic cancer beliefs and self-reported cancer screening behaviors among diverse urban residents.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2022Article
- Development and Validation of a Health Behaviour Scale: Exploratory Factor Analysis on Data from a Multicentre Study in Female Primary Care Patients.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The psychosocial burden of anogenital warts on Syrian patients: study of quality of life.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Cancer as a death sentence: developing an initial program theory for an IVR intervention.Health promotion international · 2022Article
- Development and psychometric testing of the self-regulatory questionnaire for lung cancer screening (SRQ-LCS).Psychology & health · 2022Article
- Difference in Sun Exposure Habits Between Individuals with High and Low Risk of Skin Cancer.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2021Article
- Assessment of Knowledge and Attitudes of Patients About Cancer Screenings in Primary Care.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Article
- Knowledge and experience of cancer prevention and screening among Gypsies, Roma and Travellers: a participatory qualitative study.BMC public health · 2021Article
- A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK.BMC cancer · 2018Article
- Lay Beliefs About the Accuracy and Value of Cancer Screening.American journal of preventive medicine · 2018Article
- Importance of and Satisfaction with Psychosocial Support among Cancer Patients and Survivors in Puerto Rico: Gender, Health Status, and Quality of Life Associations.Puerto Rico health sciences journal · 2017Article
- Attitudes towards lung cancer screening in socioeconomically deprived and heavy smoking communities: informing screening communication.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017Article
- Factors Associated with Delayed Diagnosis of Lymphomas: Experience with Patients from Hematology Centers in MoroccoAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2017Article
- Inequalities in cancer screening participation: examining differences in perceived benefits and barriers.Psycho-oncology · 2016Article
- Smoking is associated with pessimistic and avoidant beliefs about cancer: results from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership.British journal of cancer · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer screening programmes in England are publicly-funded. Professionals' beliefs in the public health benefits of screening can conflict with individuals' entitlements to exercise informed judgement over whether or not to participate. The recognition of the importance of individual autonomy in decision making requires greater understanding of the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs upon which people's screening choices are founded. Until recently, the technology available required that cancer screening be confined to women. This study aimed to discover whether male and female perceptions of cancer and of screening differed.
methodsData on the public's cancer beliefs were collected by means of a postal survey (anonymous questionnaire). Two general practices based in Nottingham and in Mansfield, in east-central England, sent questionnaires to registered patients aged 30 to 70 years. 1,808 completed questionnaires were returned for analysis, 56.5 per cent from women.
resultsWomen were less likely to underestimate overall cancer incidence, although each sex was more likely to cite a sex-specific cancer as being amongst the most common cancer site. In terms of risk factors, men were most uncertain about the role of stress and sexually-transmitted diseases, whereas women were more likely to rate excessive alcohol and family history as major risk factors. The majority of respondents believed the public health care system should provide cancer screening, but significantly more women than men reported having benefiting from the nationally-provided screening services. Those who were older, in better health or had longer periods of formal education were less worried about cancer than those who had illness experiences, lower incomes, or who were smokers. Actual or potential participation in bowel screening was higher amongst those who believed bowel cancer to be common and amongst men, despite women having more substantial worries about cancer than men.
conclusionOur results suggest that men's and women's differential knowledge of cancer correlates with women's closer involvement with screening. Even so, men were neither less positive about screening nor less likely to express a willingness to participate in relevant screening in the future. It is important to understand gender-related differences in knowledge and perceptions of cancer, if health promotion resources are to be allocated efficiently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.