ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009
Comparison of eukaryotic phylogenetic profiling approaches using species tree aware methods.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- CORGIAS: identifying correlated gene pairs by considering evolutionary history in a large-scale prokaryotic genome dataset.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Scalable phylogenetic profiling using MinHash uncovers likely eukaryotic sexual reproduction genes.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Novel phylogenetic methods are needed for understanding gene function in the era of mega-scale genome sequencing.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- PhyloPro2.0: a database for the dynamic exploration of phylogenetically conserved proteins and their domain architectures across the Eukarya.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
- PhyloGene server for identification and visualization of co-evolving proteins using normalized phylogenetic profiles.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Phylogenetic profiling: how much input data is enough?PloS one · 2015Article
- Human disease locus discovery and mapping to molecular pathways through phylogenetic profiling.Molecular systems biology · 2013Article
- Combining phylogenetic profiling-based and machine learning-based techniques to predict functional related proteins.PloS one · 2013Article
- Phylogenetically informed logic relationships improve detection of biological network organization.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Genetic co-occurrence network across sequenced microbes.PLoS computational biology · 2011Article
- Inference of gain and loss events from phyletic patterns using stochastic mapping and maximum parsimony--a simulation study.Genome biology and evolution · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhylogenetic profiling encompasses an important set of methodologies for in silico high throughput inference of functional relationships between genes. The simplest profiles represent the distribution of gene presence-absence in a set of species as a sequence of 0's and 1's, and it is assumed that functionally related genes will have more similar profiles. The methodology has been successfully used in numerous studies of prokaryotic genomes, although its application in eukaryotes appears problematic, with reported low accuracy due to the complex genomic organization within this domain of life. Recently some groups have proposed an alternative approach based on the correlation of homologous gene group sizes, taking into account all potentially informative genetic events leading to a change in group size, regardless of whether they result in a de novo group gain or total gene group loss.
resultsWe have compared the performance of classical presence-absence and group size based approaches using a large, diverse set of eukaryotic species. In contrast to most previous comparisons in Eukarya, we take into account the species phylogeny. We also compare the approaches using two different group categories, based on orthology and on domain-sharing. Our results confirm a limited overall performance of phylogenetic profiling in eukaryotes. Although group size based approaches initially showed an increase in performance for the domain-sharing based groups, this seems to be an overestimation due to a simplistic negative control dataset and the choice of null hypothesis rejection criteria.
conclusionPresence-absence profiling represents a more accurate classifier of related versus non-related profile pairs, when the profiles under consideration have enough information content. Group size based approaches provide a complementary means of detecting domain or family level co-evolution between groups that may be elusive to presence-absence profiling. Moreover positive correlation between co-evolution scores and functional links imply that these methods could be used to estimate functional distances between gene groups and to cluster them based on their functional relatedness. This study should have important implications for the future development and application of phylogenetic profiling methods, not only in eukaryotic, but also in prokaryotic datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.