Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19930658›Full record

ArticleBiology direct2009

Evolution by leaps: gene duplication in bacteria.

Margrethe H Serres, Alastair R W Kerr, Thomas J McCormack, Monica Riley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology direct, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The role of DNA content in shaping chromatin architecture and gene expression.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular characterization of a novel strain ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Syntax and compositionality in animal communication.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The DEAD-Box RNA Helicases ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  18. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Margrethe H SerresJosephine Bay Paul Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA. mserres@mbl.edu
Alastair R W Kerr
Thomas J McCormack
Monica Riley
Marine Biological Laboratory · USNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSequence related families of genes and proteins are common in bacterial genomes. In Escherichia coli they constitute over half of the genome. The presence of families and superfamilies of proteins suggest a history of gene duplication and divergence during evolution. Genome encoded protein families, their size and functional composition, reflect metabolic potentials of the organisms they are found in. Comparing protein families of different organisms give insight into functional differences and similarities.

resultsEquivalent enzyme families with metabolic functions were selected from the genomes of four experimentally characterized bacteria belonging to separate genera. Both similarities and differences were detected in the protein family memberships, with more similarities being detected among the more closely related organisms. Protein family memberships reflected known metabolic characteristics of the organisms. Differences in divergence of functionally characterized enzyme family members accounted for characteristics of taxa known to differ in those biochemical properties and capabilities. While some members of the gene families will have been acquired by lateral exchange and other former family members will have been lost over time, duplication and divergence of genes and functions appear to have been a significant contributor to the functional diversity of today's microbes.

conclusionsProtein families seem likely to have arisen during evolution by gene duplication and divergence where the gene copies that have been retained are the variants that have led to distinct bacterial physiologies and taxa. Thus divergence of the duplicate enzymes has been a major process in the generation of different kinds of bacteria.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DuplicationAmino Acid SequenceEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilySequence AlignmentEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19930658
PMCPMC2787491
OpenAlexW2121427573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.