ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009
Iterative pruning PCA improves resolution of highly structured populations.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the power of principal components and wright's fixation index analyzes applied to reveal the genome-wide genetic differences between herds of Holstein cows.BMC genetics · 2020Article
- Ancestry-informative marker (AIM) SNP panel for the Malay population.International journal of legal medicine · 2020Article
- A different view on fine-scale population structure in Western African populations.Human genetics · 2020Article
- IPCAPS: an R package for iterative pruning to capture population structure.Source code for biology and medicine · 2019Article
- Nonparametric approaches for population structure analysis.Human genomics · 2018Review
- A comparison of DMET Plus microarray and genome-wide technologies by assessing population substructure.Pharmacogenetics and genomics · 2016Article
- HaploPOP: a software that improves population assignment by combining markers into haplotypes.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies.Ecology and evolution · 2014Review
- Softwares and methods for estimating genetic ancestry in human populations.Human genomics · 2013Review
- Insight into the peopling of Mainland Southeast Asia from Thai population genetic structure.PloS one · 2013Article
- Article
- SHIPS: Spectral Hierarchical clustering for the Inference of Population Structure in genetic studies.PloS one · 2012Article
- Study of large and highly stratified population datasets by combining iterative pruning principal component analysis and structure.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-random patterns of genetic variation exist among individuals in a population owing to a variety of evolutionary factors. Therefore, populations are structured into genetically distinct subpopulations. As genotypic datasets become ever larger, it is increasingly difficult to correctly estimate the number of subpopulations and assign individuals to them. The computationally efficient non-parametric, chiefly Principal Components Analysis (PCA)-based methods are thus becoming increasingly relied upon for population structure analysis. Current PCA-based methods can accurately detect structure; however, the accuracy in resolving subpopulations and assigning individuals to them is wanting. When subpopulations are closely related to one another, they overlap in PCA space and appear as a conglomerate. This problem is exacerbated when some subpopulations in the dataset are genetically far removed from others. We propose a novel PCA-based framework which addresses this shortcoming.
resultsA novel population structure analysis algorithm called iterative pruning PCA (ipPCA) was developed which assigns individuals to subpopulations and infers the total number of subpopulations present. Genotypic data from simulated and real population datasets with different degrees of structure were analyzed. For datasets with simple structures, the subpopulation assignments of individuals made by ipPCA were largely consistent with the STRUCTURE, BAPS and AWclust algorithms. On the other hand, highly structured populations containing many closely related subpopulations could be accurately resolved only by ipPCA, and not by other methods.
conclusionThe algorithm is computationally efficient and not constrained by the dataset complexity. This systematic subpopulation assignment approach removes the need for prior population labels, which could be advantageous when cryptic stratification is encountered in datasets containing individuals otherwise assumed to belong to a homogenous population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.