Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19930626›Full record

Trial reportTrials2009

Does point of care prothrombin time measurement reduce the transfusion of fresh frozen plasma in patients undergoing major surgery? The POC-OP randomized-controlled trial.

Natalie Urwyler, Sven Trelle, Lorenz Theiler, Peter Jüni, Lukas P Staub, Cedric Luyet, Lorenzo Alberio, Kay Stricker, Robert Greif

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00656396 (Does Point of Care Coagulation Testing Reduce the Transfusion of Non-erythrocyte Blood Products in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery? A Randomized-Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00656396 phase3completednot on this map

Does Point of Care Coagulation Testing Reduce the Transfusion of Non-erythrocyte Blood Products in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery? A Randomized-Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BernRan2008 to 2011Enrolled228ConditionsBlood Loss, SurgicalArmsCoagucheck XS Plus (Point of care monitor of coagulation intraoperative), Control Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalie UrwylerUniversity Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, University Hospital of Bern, Inselspital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland. natalie.urwyler@insel.ch
Sven Trelle
Lorenz Theiler
Peter Jüni
Lukas P Staub
Cedric Luyet
Lorenzo Alberio
Kay Stricker
Robert Greif
University Hospital of Bern · CHInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine · CHCooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBleeding is a frequent complication during surgery. The intraoperative administration of blood products, including packed red blood cells, platelets and fresh frozen plasma (FFP), is often live saving. Complications of blood transfusions contribute considerably to perioperative costs and blood product resources are limited. Consequently, strategies to optimize the decision to transfuse are needed. Bleeding during surgery is a dynamic process and may result in major blood loss and coagulopathy due to dilution and consumption. The indication for transfusion should be based on reliable coagulation studies. While hemoglobin levels and platelet counts are available within 15 minutes, standard coagulation studies require one hour. Therefore, the decision to administer FFP has to be made in the absence of any data. Point of care testing of prothrombin time ensures that one major parameter of coagulation is available in the operation theatre within minutes. It is fast, easy to perform, inexpensive and may enable physicians to rationally determine the need for FFP. METHODS/

designThe objective of the POC-OP trial is to determine the effectiveness of point of care prothrombin time testing to reduce the administration of FFP. It is a patient and assessor blind, single center randomized controlled parallel group trial in 220 patients aged between 18 and 90 years undergoing major surgery (any type, except cardiac surgery and liver transplantation) with an estimated blood loss during surgery exceeding 20% of the calculated total blood volume or a requirement of FFP according to the judgment of the physicians in charge. Patients are randomized to usual care plus point of care prothrombin time testing or usual care alone without point of care testing. The primary outcome is the relative risk to receive any FFP perioperatively. The inclusion of 110 patients per group will yield more than 80% power to detect a clinically relevant relative risk of 0.60 to receive FFP of the experimental as compared with the control group. DISCUSSION: Point of care prothrombin time testing in the operation theatre may reduce the administration of FFP considerably, which in turn may decrease costs and complications usually associated with the administration of blood products.

trial registrationNCT00656396.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionPoint-of-Care SystemsProthrombin TimeSurgical Procedures, OperativeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerioperative CarePlasmaResearch DesignSample Size

Identifiers

PMID19930626
PMCPMC2785779
OpenAlexW2141531831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.