Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19929828›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in medicinal chemistry2010

Hydrophobicity--shake flasks, protein folding and drug discovery.

Aurijit Sarkar, Glen E Kellogg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in medicinal chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Cholesterol-dependent enzyme activity of human TSPO1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Veterinary world · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aurijit SarkarDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Box 980540, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond VA, 23298-0540, USA.
Glen E Kellogg

Funding

New Hydropathy-Based computer Tools for Drug DiscoveryR01GM071894 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KELLOGG, GLEN EUGENE · 2005 to 2009
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071894NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM071894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrophobic interactions are some of the most important interactions in nature. They are the primary driving force in a number of phenomena. This is mostly an entropic effect and can account for a number of biophysical events such as protein-protein or protein-ligand binding that are of immense importance in drug design. The earliest studies on this phenomenon can be dated back to the end of the 19(th) century when Meyer and Overton independently correlated the hydrophobic nature of gases to their anesthetic potency. Since then, significant progress has been made in this realm of science. This review briefly traces the history of hydrophobicity research along with the theoretical estimation of partition coefficients. Finally, the application of hydrophobicity estimation methods in the field of drug design and protein folding is discussed.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryProtein FoldingDrug DesignHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsPharmaceutical PreparationsProteinsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipPharmaceutical PreparationsProteins

Identifiers

PMID19929828
PMCPMC2851852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.