Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19927075›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery2009

Magnetic resonance neurography and diffusion tensor imaging: origins, history, and clinical impact of the first 50,000 cases with an assessment of efficacy and utility in a prospective 5000-patient study group.

Aaron Filler

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Magnetic resonance tractography of the brachial plexus: step-by-step.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Neurobiology of Eating Disorders.Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Toward valid and reliable brain imaging results in eating disorders.The International journal of eating disorders · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aaron FillerInstitute for Nerve Medicine, Santa Monica, California 90405, USA. afiller@nervemed.com

Funding

CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES TRAINING PROGRAMT32NS007144 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI OJEMANN, GEORGE A · 1985 to 2008
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5 T32 GM07117-09 0011NINDS NIH HHS 5T32 NS-07144-09NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007144Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMethods were invented that made it possible to image peripheral nerves in the body and to image neural tracts in the brain. The history, physical basis, and dyadic tensor concept underlying the methods are reviewed. Over a 15-year period, these techniques-magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) and diffusion tensor imaging-were deployed in the clinical and research community in more than 2500 published research reports and applied to approximately 50,000 patients. Within this group, approximately 5000 patients having MRN were carefully tracked on a prospective basis.

methodsA uniform Neurography imaging methodology was applied in the study group, and all images were reviewed and registered by referral source, clinical indication, efficacy of imaging, and quality. Various classes of image findings were identified and subjected to a variety of small targeted prospective outcome studies. Those findings demonstrated to be clinically significant were then tracked in the larger clinical volume data set.

resultsMRN demonstrates mechanical distortion of nerves, hyperintensity consistent with nerve irritation, nerve swelling, discontinuity, relations of nerves to masses, and image features revealing distortion of nerves at entrapment points. These findings are often clinically relevant and warrant full consideration in the diagnostic process. They result in specific pathological diagnoses that are comparable to electrodiagnostic testing in clinical efficacy. A review of clinical outcome studies with diffusion tensor imaging also shows convincing utility.

conclusionMRN and diffusion tensor imaging neural tract imaging have been validated as indispensable clinical diagnostic methods that provide reliable anatomic pathological information. There is no alternative diagnostic method in many situations. With the elapsing of 15 years, tens of thousands of imaging studies, and thousands of publications, these methods should no longer be considered experimental.

Indexed as

Diffusion Tensor ImagingHistory, 20th CenturyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMonitoring, IntraoperativeNeural PathwaysNeuronavigationOutcome Assessment, Health CarePeripheral NervesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID19927075
PMCPMC2924821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.