Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19926850›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009

Ubiquitous internal gene duplication and intron creation in eukaryotes.

Xiang Gao, Michael Lynch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Association Study of the 5'UTR Intron of theFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Intron evolution in Saccharomycetaceae.Genome biology and evolution · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiang GaoDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. gao3@indiana.edu
Michael Lynch

Funding

A global evolutionary analysis of eukaryotic duplication processesF32GM083550 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI GAO, XIANG · 2008 to 2009
$116k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM083550NIGMS NIH HHS F32GM083550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duplication of genomic segments provides a primary resource for the origin of evolutionary novelties. However, most previous studies have focused on duplications of complete protein-coding genes, whereas little is known about the significance of duplication segments that are entirely internal to genes. Our examination of six fully sequenced genomes reveals that internal duplications of gene segments occur at a high frequency (0.001-0.013 duplications/gene per million years), similar to that of complete gene duplications, such that 8-17% of the genes in a genome carry duplicated intronic and/or exonic regions. At least 7-30% of such genes have acquired novel introns, either because a prior intron in the same gene has been duplicated, or more commonly, because a spatial change has activated a latent splice site. These results strongly suggest a major evolutionary role for internal gene duplications in the origin of genomic novelties, particularly as a mechanism for intron gain.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationAnimalsDNA, ComplementaryEukaryotaHalf-LifeIntronsReproducibility of ResultsRNA Splice SitesTime FactorsDNA, ComplementaryRNA Splice Sites

Identifiers

PMID19926850
PMCPMC2791625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.