Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19926747›Full record

ArticleThe European respiratory journal2010

Home and workplace smoking bans in Italy, Ireland, Sweden, France and the Czech Republic.

J E Heck, I Stücker, S Allwright, E R Gritz, M Haglund, C G Healton, E Kralikova, S Sanchez Del Mazo, E Tamang, C M Dresler and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European respiratory journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02440321 (The Third Year Project of The Associated Factors of Smoking Around School-aged Children and The Intervention Development Using the Theory of Reasoned Action), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02440321 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

The Third Year Project of The Associated Factors of Smoking Around School-aged Children and The Intervention Development Using the Theory of Reasoned Action

TypeinterventionalSponsorTaipei Medical UniversityRan2011 to 2012Enrolled150ConditionsEnvironmental Tobacco SmokeArmsParent-child interactive program, written materials
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

J E HeckInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
I Stücker
S Allwright
E R Gritz
M Haglund
C G Healton
E Kralikova
S Sanchez Del Mazo
E Tamang
C M Dresler
M Hashibe
American Legacy Foundation · USArkansas Department of Health · USCentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRCharles University · CZInstitut National de Recherche en Santé Publique · MLPublic Health Agency of Sweden · SERegione del Veneto · ITThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA Career Development Program in Cancer Prevention and Control ResearchR25CA087949 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BASTANI, ROSHAN · 2000 to 2014
$6.8M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA087949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to report predictors and prevalence of home and workplace smoking bans in five European countries. We conducted a population-based telephone survey of 4,977 females, ascertaining factors associated with smoking bans. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were derived using unconditional logistic regression. A complete home smoking ban was reported by 59.5% of French, 63.5% of Irish, 61.3% of Italian, 74.4% of Czech and 87.0% of Swedish females. Home smoking bans were associated with younger age and being bothered by secondhand smoke, and among smokers, inversely associated with greater tobacco dependence. Among nonsmokers, bans were also related to believing smoking is harmful (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.11-1.30) and having parents who smoke (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.52-0.73). Workplace bans were reported by 92.6% of French, 96.5% of Irish, 77.9% of Italian, 79.1% of Czech and 88.1% of Swedish females. Workplace smoking bans were reported less often among those in technical positions (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50-0.82) and among skilled workers (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.88) than among professional workers. Workplace smoking bans are in place for most workers in these countries. Having a home smoking ban was based on smoking behaviour, demographics, beliefs and personal preference.

Indexed as

HousingSmoking PreventionWorkplaceAdolescentAdultAir Pollution, IndoorCzech RepublicFemaleFranceHumansIrelandItalyLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedPublic PolicySmokingTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID19926747
PMCPMC4629784
OpenAlexW2144810951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.