Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19925657›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2009

Gene expression profiles of mouse spermatogenesis during recovery from irradiation.

Fozia J Shah, Masami Tanaka, John E Nielsen, Teruaki Iwamoto, Shinichi Kobayashi, Niels E Skakkebaek, Henrik Leffers, Kristian Almstrup

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transcriptome profiling of mice testes following low dose irradiation.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2013
    Article
  6. Hydrogen-rich saline protects spermatogenesis and hematopoiesis in irradiated BALB/c mice.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fozia J ShahUniversity Department of Growth and Reproduction GR-5064, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark. fozzi.shah@gmail.com
Masami Tanaka
John E Nielsen
Teruaki Iwamoto
Shinichi Kobayashi
Niels E Skakkebaek
Henrik Leffers
Kristian Almstrup
Rigshospitalet · DKSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPInternational University of Health and Welfare · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIrradiation or chemotherapy that suspend normal spermatogenesis is commonly used to treat various cancers. Fortunately, spermatogenesis in many cases can be restored after such treatments but knowledge is limited about the re-initiation process. Earlier studies have described the cellular changes that happen during recovery from irradiation by means of histology. We have earlier generated gene expression profiles during induction of spermatogenesis in mouse postnatal developing testes and found a correlation between profiles and the expressing cell types. The aim of the present work was to utilize the link between expression profile and cell types to follow the cellular changes that occur during post-irradiation recovery of spermatogenesis in order to describe recovery by means of gene expression.

methodsAdult mouse testes were subjected to irradiation with 1 Gy or a fractionated radiation of two times 1 Gy. Testes were sampled every third or fourth day to follow the recovery of spermatogenesis and gene expression profiles generated by means of differential display RT-PCR. In situ hybridization was in addition performed to verify cell-type specific gene expression patterns.

resultsIrradiation of mice testis created a gap in spermatogenesis, which was initiated by loss of A1 to B-spermatogonia and lasted for approximately 10 days. Irradiation with 2 times 1 Gy showed a more pronounced effect on germ cell elimination than with 1 Gy, but spermatogenesis was in both cases completely reconstituted 42 days after irradiation. Comparison of expression profiles indicated that the cellular reconstitution appeared equivalent to what is observed during induction of normal spermatogenesis.

conclusionThe data indicates that recovery of spermatogenesis can be monitored by means of gene expression, which could aid in designing radiation treatment regimes for cancer patients leading to better restoration of spermatogenesis.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAnimalsBody WeightDNA-Binding ProteinsGATA1 Transcription FactorMaleMiceMice, Inbred C3HNuclear ProteinsOrgan SizeOrgan SpecificityRecovery of FunctionRNA-Binding ProteinsSpermatogenesisSpermatogoniaTestisDAZL protein, mouseDNA-Binding ProteinsGata1 protein, mouseGATA1 Transcription FactorNuclear ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsTnp2 protein, mouseVesicular Transport ProteinsVps26 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID19925657
PMCPMC2784772
OpenAlexW2117680234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.