Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19925429›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2009

Use of cell lines in the investigation of pharmacogenetic loci.

Wei Zhang, M Eileen Dolan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bioinformatics challenges for personalized medicine.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2011
    Article
  11. Integrating microRNAs into a system biology approach to acute lung injury.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2011
    Review
  12. Article
  13. The emerging role of microRNAs in drug responses.Current opinion in molecular therapeutics · 2010
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Pharmacogenomics discovery and implementation in genome-wide association studies era.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wei ZhangSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
M Eileen Dolan
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Whole GenomeU01GM061393 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI COX, NANCY J, DOLAN, MARY EILEEN · 2000 to 2014
$39.0M
Variation in Hormone and xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme genes and breast cancerP50CA125183 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI COX, NANCY · 2006 to 2010
$11.3M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA125183NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM061393NIGMS NIH HHS U01GM61393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug response and toxicity, complex traits that are often highly varied among individuals, likely involve multiple genetic and non-genetic factors. Pharmacogenomic research aims to individualize therapy in an effort to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity for each patient. Cell lines can be used as a model system for cellular pharmacologic effects, which include, but are not limited to, drug-induced cytotoxicity or apoptosis, biochemical effects and enzymatic reactions. Because severe toxicities may be associated with drugs such as chemotherapeutics, cell lines derived from healthy individuals or patients provide a convenient model to study how human genetic variation alters response to these drugs that would be unsafe or unethical to administer to human volunteers. In addition to the traditional candidate gene approaches that focus on well-understood candidate genes and pathways, the availability of extensive genotypic and phenotypic data on some cell line models has begun to allow genome-wide association (GWA) studies to simultaneously test the entire human genome for associations with drug response and toxicity. Though with some important limitations, the use of these cell lines in pharmacogenomic discovery demonstrates the promise of constructing a more comprehensive model that may ultimately integrate both genetic and non-genetic factors to predict individual response and toxicity to anticancer drugs.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPharmacogeneticsAntineoplastic AgentsCell LineDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsGene ExpressionGenetic VariationHumansNeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID19925429
PMCPMC2782819
OpenAlexW2134358696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.