Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19924360›Full record

ReviewHNO2009

[Diagnostic and interventional endoscopy in gastroenterology : from high-resolution chips and procedures for endoscopic resection to NOTES].

J Hochberger, E Kruse, P Köhler, K-F Bürrig, D Menke

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

J HochbergerMedizinische Klinik III, Schwerpunkt Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Interventionelle Endoskopie, St.-Bernward-Krankenhaus, Akad. Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Göttingen, Treibestrasse 9, 31134, Hildesheim, Deutschland. prof.dr.j.hochberger@bernward-khs.de
E Kruse
P Köhler
K-F Bürrig
D Menke
St. Bernward Krankenhaus · DEFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DEUniversity of Hildesheim · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past 10 years endoscopic diagnostics has benefited from technologies such as big chips, high-definition television (HDTV) and narrow band imaging (NBI). Video capsule endoscopy and double balloon enteroscopy have facilitated visualization of the entire small bowel. A number of studies on mucosal Barrett's and gastric cancers could prove that endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is oncologically equivalent to surgical resection when certain criteria are respected. However, EMR is less invasive and carries a substantially lower complication risk and mortality compared to surgery. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) facilitates en bloc resection with thorough histopathologic evaluation of the specimen, e.g. for mucosal lesions in the stomach and rectum. Endosonography (EUS) guided transgastric necrosectomy using a flexible gastroscope has set a milestone in the treatment of infected pancreatic necroses and has replaced open surgery in many centers. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) uses natural body openings as minimally invasive access to the abdomen and mediastinum. Interventional GI endoscopists and minimally invasive surgeons have profited from these innovations in micromechanics and microelectronics.

Indexed as

Endoscopes, GastrointestinalEndoscopy, GastrointestinalComputersEquipment DesignGastrointestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansImage EnhancementImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicro-Electrical-Mechanical SystemsMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresTelevision

Identifiers

PMID19924360
OpenAlexW1598182569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.