Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19923904›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines2009

Vaccines against tularemia.

Eileen M Barry, Leah E Cole, Araceli E Santiago

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Comparative evaluation of protective immunity againstFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Deletion Mutants ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Glycoconjugate vaccine using a genetically modified O antigen induces protective antibodies toProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eileen M BarryUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Center for Vaccine Development, Baltimore, MD, USA. ebarry@medicine.umaryland.edu
Leah E Cole
Araceli E Santiago

Funding

Vaccine strategy for broad spectrum protection agains non-typhoidal salmonellU54AI057168 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BARRY, EILEEN M. · 2003 to 2013
$91.5M
Advancement of New Live Attenuated F. Tularensis Type A Vaccine StrainsU01AI077909 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BARRY, EILEEN M. · 2009 to 2010
$1.1M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI077909NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Francisella tularensis is a Category A select agent for which vaccine and countermeasure development are a priority. In the past eight years, renewed interest in this pathogen has led to the generation of an enormous amount of new data on both the pathogen itself and its interaction with host cells. This information has fostered the development of various vaccine candidates including acellular subunit, killed whole cell and live attenuated. This review summarizes the progress and promise of these various candidates.

Indexed as

Bacterial VaccinesBioterrorismFrancisella tularensisHumansTularemiaVaccines, AcellularVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, InactivatedBacterial VaccinesVaccines, AcellularVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID19923904
PMCPMC3132883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.