ArticleJournal of virology2010
Infection with strains of Citrus tristeza virus does not exclude superinfection by other strains of the virus.
Article in Journal of virology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of the Matrix Protein as a Conserved and Central Determinant of Superinfection Exclusion in Plant Rhabdoviruses.Molecular plant pathology · 2025Article
- Latent infection of Caenorhabditis elegans by Orsay virus induces age-dependent immunity and cross-protection.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Progress in Our Understanding of the Cross-Protection Mechanism of CTV-VT No-SY Isolates Against Homologous SY Isolates.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- CuBe: a geminivirus-based copper-regulated expression system suitable for post-harvest activation.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Differentiation and validation of mild and severe strains of citrus tristeza virus through codon usage bias, host adaptation, and biochemical profiling.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Intra-Host Citrus Tristeza Virus Populations during Prolonged Infection Initiated by a Well-Defined Sequence Variant inViruses · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- Transcriptomic alterations in the sweet orange vasculature correlate with growth repression induced by a variant of citrus tristeza virus.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Better together: the use of virus-induced gene silencing technique to repress the expression of two endogenous citrus genes simultaneously.Plant signaling & behavior · 2022Article
- Article
- Viruses Infecting Trees and Herbs That Produce Edible Fleshy Fruits with a Prominent Value in the Global Market: An Evolutionary Perspective.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Determinants of Persistent Patterns of Pepino Mosaic Virus Mixed Infections.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Walking Together: Cross-Protection, Genome Conservation, and the Replication Machinery ofViruses · 2020Review
- Superinfection Exclusion in Mosquitoes and Its Potential as an Arbovirus Control Strategy.Viruses · 2020Review
- Article
- Citrus tristeza virus: A large RNA virus with complex biology turned into a valuable tool for crop protection.PLoS pathogens · 2020Review
- Chikungunya virus superinfection exclusion is mediated by a block in viral replication and does not rely on non-structural protein 2.PloS one · 2020Article
- The Matrix Protein of a Plant Rhabdovirus Mediates Superinfection Exclusion by Inhibiting Viral Transcription.Journal of virology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Superinfection exclusion or homologous interference, a phenomenon in which a primary viral infection prevents a secondary infection with the same or closely related virus, has been observed commonly for viruses in various systems, including viruses of bacteria, plants, and animals. With plant viruses, homologous interference initially was used as a test of virus relatedness to define whether two virus isolates were "strains" of the same virus or represented different viruses, and subsequently purposeful infection with a mild isolate was implemented as a protective measure against isolates of the virus causing severe disease. In this study we examined superinfection exclusion of Citrus tristeza virus (CTV), a positive-sense RNA closterovirus. Thirteen naturally occurring isolates of CTV representing five different virus strains and a set of isolates originated from virus constructs engineered based on an infectious cDNA clone of T36 isolate of CTV, including hybrids containing sequences from different isolates, were examined for their ability to prevent superinfection by another isolate of the virus. We show that superinfection exclusion occurred only between isolates of the same strain and not between isolates of different strains. When isolates of the same strain were used for sequential plant inoculation, the primary infection provided complete exclusion of the challenge isolate, whereas isolates from heterologous strains appeared to have no effect on replication, movement or systemic infection by the challenge virus. Surprisingly, substitution of extended cognate sequences from isolates of the T68 or T30 strains into T36 did not confer the ability of resulting hybrid viruses to exclude superinfection by those donor strains. Overall, these results do not appear to be explained by mechanisms proposed previously for other viruses. Moreover, these observations bring an understanding of some previously unexplained fundamental features of CTV biology and, most importantly, build a foundation for the strategy of selecting mild isolates that would efficiently exclude severe virus isolates as a practical means to control CTV diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.