ArticleBMC public health2009
The past, present and future of HIV, AIDS and resource allocation.
Article in BMC public health, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- State of HIV costing in Latin America and the Caribbean: a systematic literature review.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024Review
- Getting resources to those who need them: the evidence we need to budget for underserved populations in sub-Saharan Africa.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2021Article
- Using Evidence to Drive Impact: Developing the FP Goals Impact Matrix.Studies in family planning · 2019Article
- The influence of constraints on the efficient allocation of resources for HIV prevention.AIDS (London, England) · 2019Article
- Retest and treat: a review of national HIV retesting guidelines to inform elimination of mother-to-child HIV transmission (EMTCT) efforts.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2019Article
- Article
- Psychiatric Illness, Substance Use, and Viral Suppression Among HIV-Positive Men of Color Who Have Sex with Men in Los Angeles.AIDS and behavior · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Age Targeting of Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Programs Using the Decision Makers' Program Planning Toolkit (DMPPT) 2.0.PloS one · 2016Article
- A decade of investments in monitoring the HIV epidemic: how far have we come? A descriptive analysis.Health research policy and systems · 2014Article
- Optimal incentives for allocating HIV/AIDS prevention resources among multiple populations.Health care management science · 2012Article
- Knowing your HIV/AIDS epidemic and tailoring an effective response: how did India do it?Sexually transmitted infections · 2012Article
- Pattern and levels of spending allocated to HIV prevention programs in low- and middle-income countries.BMC public health · 2012Article
- The OptAIDS project: towards global halting of HIV/AIDS.BMC public health · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHow should HIV and AIDS resources be allocated to achieve the greatest possible impact? This paper begins with a theoretical discussion of this issue, describing the key elements of an "evidence-based allocation strategy". While it is noted that the quality of epidemiological and economic data remains inadequate to define such an optimal strategy, there do exist tools and research which can lead countries in a way that they can make allocation decisions. Furthermore, there are clear indications that most countries are not allocating their HIV and AIDS resources in a way which is likely to achieve the greatest possible impact. For example, it is noted that neighboring countries, even when they have a similar prevalence of HIV, nonetheless often allocate their resources in radically different ways. These differing allocation patterns appear to be attributable to a number of different issues, including a lack of data, contradictory results in existing data, a need for overemphasizing a multisectoral response, a lack of political will, a general inefficiency in the use of resources when they do get allocated, poor planning and a lack of control over the way resources get allocated.
methodsThere are a number of tools currently available which can improve the resource-allocation process. Tools such as the Resource Needs Model (RNM) can provide policymakers with a clearer idea of resource requirements, whereas other tools such as Goals and the Allocation by Cost-Effectiveness (ABCE) models can provide countries with a clearer vision of how they might reallocate funds.
resultsExamples from nine different countries provide information about how policymakers are trying to make their resource-allocation strategies more "evidence based". By identifying the challenges and successes of these nine countries in making more informed allocation decisions, it is hoped that future resource-allocation decisions for all countries can be improved.
conclusionWe discuss the future of resource allocation, noting the types of additional data which will be required and the improvements in existing tools which could be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.