Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19922652›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2009

CTCF binding site classes exhibit distinct evolutionary, genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic features.

Kobby Essien, Sebastien Vigneau, Sofia Apreleva, Larry N Singh, Marisa S Bartolomei, Sridhar Hannenhalli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Crosstalk BetweenCancers · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Benefiting from the intrinsic role of epigenetics to predict patterns of CTCF binding.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Regulation ofMolecular and cellular biology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kobby EssienPenn Center for Bioinformatics, Department of Genetics, 415 Curie Boulevard, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. kobby@pcbi.upenn.edu
Sebastien Vigneau
Sofia Apreleva
Larry N Singh
Marisa S Bartolomei
Sridhar Hannenhalli
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Training Program in Computational GenomicsT32HG000046 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JUNHYONG KIM, Mingyao Li · 1999 to 2026
$9.5M
Epigenetic Regulation of Imprinting in Mouse EmbryoR01HD042026 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BARTOLOMEI, MARISA S. · 2002 to 2012
$3.5M
Methods for evolutionary analysis of eukaryotic transcriptional regulationR01GM085226 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI HANNENHALLI, SRIDHAR · 2008 to 2011
$1.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32-HG-000046NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD042026NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM085226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCTCF (CCCTC-binding factor) is an evolutionarily conserved zinc finger protein involved in diverse functions ranging from negative regulation of MYC, to chromatin insulation of the beta-globin gene cluster, to imprinting of the Igf2 locus. The 11 zinc fingers of CTCF are known to differentially contribute to the CTCF-DNA interaction at different binding sites. It is possible that the differences in CTCF-DNA conformation at different binding sites underlie CTCF's functional diversity. If so, the CTCF binding sites may belong to distinct classes, each compatible with a specific functional role.

resultsWe have classified approximately 26,000 CTCF binding sites in CD4+ T cells into three classes based on their similarity to the well-characterized CTCF DNA-binding motif. We have comprehensively characterized these three classes of CTCF sites with respect to several evolutionary, genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic and functional features. We find that the low-occupancy sites tend to be cell type specific. Furthermore, while the high-occupancy sites associate with repressive histone marks and greater gene co-expression within a CTCF-flanked block, the low-occupancy sites associate with active histone marks and higher gene expression. We found that the low-occupancy sites have greater conservation in their flanking regions compared to high-occupancy sites. Interestingly, based on a novel class-conservation metric, we observed that human low-occupancy sites tend to be conserved as low-occupancy sites in mouse (and vice versa) more frequently than expected.

conclusionsOur work reveals several key differences among CTCF occupancy-based classes and suggests a critical, yet distinct functional role played by low-occupancy sites.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticTranscription, GeneticAmino Acid MotifsBinding SitesCCCTC-Binding FactorCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesDNAEvolution, MolecularGenomicsHistonesHumansJurkat CellsModels, GeneticMultigene FamilyRepressor ProteinsCCCTC-Binding FactorCTCF protein, humanCtcf protein, mouseDNAHistonesRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19922652
PMCPMC3091324
OpenAlexW2163076209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.