Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19922422›Full record

ArticleImmunology2010

A comparison between isolated blood dendritic cells and monocyte-derived dendritic cells in pigs.

Marina R Facci, Gael Auray, Rachelle Buchanan, Jill van Kessel, David R Thompson, Sarah Mackenzie-Dyck, Lorne A Babiuk, Volker Gerdts

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Development ofFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A PorcinemBio · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Bovine DerivedFrontiers in immunology · 2019
    Article
  9. CD1Scientific reports · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. An activated immune and inflammatory response targets the pancreas of newborn pigs with cystic fibrosis.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2011
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marina R FacciVaccine & Infectious Disease Organization, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK.
Gael Auray
Rachelle Buchanan
Jill van Kessel
David R Thompson
Sarah Mackenzie-Dyck
Lorne A Babiuk
Volker Gerdts

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various dendritic cell (DC) populations exist that differ in phenotype and ability to present antigen to T cells. For example, plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) are less potent T cell activators compared with conventional DCs (cDCs). Here, we compared porcine blood DCs (BDCs), containing pDCs and cDCs, and monocyte-derived DCs (MoDC), consisting of cDCs, in their phenotype, ability to uptake antigen, activation and maturation and their ability to present antigen to autologous T cells. Pigs represent an important animal model, whose immune system in many respects closely resembles that of humans. For example, the distribution of Toll-like receptors is similar to that of humans, in contrast to that of mice. Here we demonstrate that both populations endocytose foreign material. Following lipopolysaccharide stimulation, CD80/86 and chemokine receptor (CCR)7 expression was increased in both populations as was the expression of the chemokine ligands (CCL)-2, CCL-4, CCL-20 and CXCL-2. Although basal and post-stimulation protein concentrations of interleukins 6 and 8 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha were higher in MoDCs, protein concentrations showed a higher fold increase in BDCs. Antigen-specific proliferation of autologous T cells was induced by MoDCs and BDCs. Interestingly, while MoDCs induced stronger proliferation in naive T cells, no difference in proliferation was observed when primed T cells were studied. These results demonstrate that isolated porcine BDCs are highly responsive to stimulation with lipopolysaccharide and are functionally able to drive primed T-cell proliferation to the same extent as MoDCs.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationSus scrofaAnimalsAntigen PresentationAntigens, CDCell ProliferationChemokinesCytokinesDendritic CellsDextransEndocytosisFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateGene ExpressionImmunophenotypingLipopolysaccharidesLymphocyte ActivationAntigens, CDCCR7 protein, humanChemokinesCytokinesDextransFluorescein-5-isothiocyanatefluorescein isothiocyanate dextranLipopolysaccharidesOvalbuminReceptors, CCR7

Identifiers

PMID19922422
PMCPMC2826684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.