ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2010
Development of SNP-based human identification system.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a coding SNP panel for tracking the origin of whole-exome sequencing samples.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Alternatives to amelogenin markers for sex determination in humans and their forensic relevance.Molecular biology reports · 2020Review
- Evaluation of ten SNP Markers for Human Identification and Paternity Analysis in Persian Population.Iranian journal of biotechnology · 2019Article
- Hair Proteome Variation at Different Body Locations on Genetically Variant Peptide Detection for Protein-Based Human Identification.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Trends in plant research using molecular markers.Planta · 2018Review
- A SNP panel for identification of DNA and RNA specimens.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- How many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are needed to replace short tandem repeats (STRs) in forensic applications?International journal of legal medicine · 2017Article
- Evaluation of Digital PCR as a Technique for Monitoring Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplantation.Genomics & informatics · 2017Article
- A SNP panel and online tool for checking genotype concordance through comparing QR codes.PloS one · 2017Article
- Article
- Genotyping of 75 SNPs using arrays for individual identification in five population groups.International journal of legal medicine · 2016Article
- Evaluating information content of SNPs for sample-tagging in re-sequencing projects.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- SNPflow: a lightweight application for the processing, storing and automatic quality checking of genotyping assays.PloS one · 2013Article
- Superimposition technique for skull identification with Afloat® software.International journal of legal medicine · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) appeal to the forensic DNA community because of their abundance in the human genome, low mutation rate, small amplicon size, and feasibility of high-throughput genotyping technologies.In an initial screening, we identified six SNP markers of sex determination by resequencing the amelogenin genes and the zinc finger protein genes located on the sex chromosomes. Furthermore, for use in human identification,we selected 30 highly polymorphic autosomal SNP markers from among a human population and examined the potential utility of these SNP markers for human identification.The combined mean match probability of 30 SNP markers was 4.83 x 10(-13). Using genotyping data from 8,842 unrelated Korean individuals, we also found that discrimination power increased 10-fold for the addition of every five SNP markers in human identification. In this study, we demonstrated that SNP markers are very useful for sex determination and human identification, even in a very homogeneous population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.