Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19921152›Full record

GuidelineIntensive care medicine2010

Prevention of acute kidney injury and protection of renal function in the intensive care unit. Expert opinion of the Working Group for Nephrology, ESICM.

Michael Joannidis, Wilfred Druml, Lui G Forni, A B Johan Groeneveld, Patrick Honore, Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten, Claudio Ronco, Marie R C Schetz, Arend Jan Woittiez, Critical Care Nephrology Working Group of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readPractice GuidelineReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Intensive care medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 60 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. How should we treat acute kidney injury caused by renal congestion?Kidney research and clinical practice · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Michael JoannidisMedical Intensive Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstasse 31, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. michael.joannidis@i-med.ac.at
Wilfred Druml
Lui G Forni
A B Johan Groeneveld
Patrick Honore
Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten
Claudio Ronco
Marie R C Schetz
Arend Jan Woittiez
Critical Care Nephrology Working Group of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBCatholic University of America · USInnsbruck Medical University · ATOLVG · NLOspedale San Bortolo · ITQueen Astrid Military Hospital · BEUniversity of Groningen · NLVienna General Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute renal failure on the intensive care unit is associated with significant mortality and morbidity.

objectivesTo determine recommendations for the prevention of acute kidney injury (AKI), focusing on the role of potential preventative maneuvers including volume expansion, diuretics, use of inotropes, vasopressors/vasodilators, hormonal interventions, nutrition, and extracorporeal techniques.

methodA systematic search of the literature was performed for studies using these potential protective agents in adult patients at risk for acute renal failure/kidney injury between 1966 and 2009. The following clinical conditions were considered: major surgery, critical illness, sepsis, shock, and use of potentially nephrotoxic drugs and radiocontrast media. Where possible the following endpoints were extracted: creatinine clearance, glomerular filtration rate, increase in serum creatinine, urine output, and markers of tubular injury. Clinical endpoints included the need for renal replacement therapy, length of stay, and mortality. Studies are graded according to the international Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) group system. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Several measures are recommended, though none carries grade 1A. We recommend prompt resuscitation of the circulation with special attention to providing adequate hydration whilst avoiding high-molecular-weight hydroxy-ethyl starch (HES) preparations, maintaining adequate blood pressure using vasopressors in vasodilatory shock. We suggest specific vasodilators [corrected] under strict hemodynamic control, sodium bicarbonate for emergency procedures administering contrast media, and periprocedural hemofiltration in severe chronic renal insufficiency undergoing coronary intervention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-009-1678-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsAcute Kidney InjuryCardiotonic AgentsClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyConsensusExtracorporeal CirculationFluid TherapyHumansProtein C InhibitorSodium Potassium Chloride Symporter InhibitorsVasodilator AgentsCardiotonic AgentsProtein C InhibitorSodium Potassium Chloride Symporter InhibitorsVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID19921152
OpenAlexW1607904600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.