Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19920903›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2009

Maraviroc in the treatment of HIV infection.

Neelanjana Ray

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Biased Allosteric Modulation in GPCR Drug Discovery.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Exceptionally broad HIV-1 neutralization via bispecific antibody-mediated prepositioning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neelanjana RayDepartment of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3610 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, USA. nray@mail.med.upenn.edu
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While a successful HIV vaccine will likely take several more years to become a reality, many anti-retroviral (ARV) drugs are currently available to treat HIV infection, and their efficacious use has improved the quality of life and life expectancy of millions of HIV-infected individuals. A recent addition to these ARVs is a new class of drug that targets the HIV entry process by interfering with the action of the CCR5 coreceptor. The first licensed member of this class is a drug called maraviroc, which is also the first ARV that targets a cellular rather than a viral protein. Several other CCR5 antagonists with varied mechanisms of action are being developed. Key issues with the use of these drugs include determining their potential for use in treatment-naïve versus treatment-experienced patients, the development of sensitive coreceptor phenotyping assays to determine patient eligibility, and finally monitoring the emergence of resistant viruses and their mechanisms of resistance. This review summarizes the preclinical and clinical development of maraviroc as well as studies of HIV resistance to this drug both in vitro and in patients. In addition, a range of diverse CCR5 antagonists currently under development, are also discussed.

Indexed as

CCR5 inhibitorcoreceptor usagedrug resistanceHIVmaraviroc

Identifiers

PMID19920903
PMCPMC2761192
OpenAlexW2000825287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.