SynthesisAnnals of internal medicine2009
Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Synthesis in Annals of internal medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03928886 (Discomfort Assessment of Senographe Pristina Patient-assisted Versus Standard Compression Mode in Asymptomatic Adult Women Undergoing Screening Full-filled Digital Mammography and Quality Evaluation of Screening Mammograms), which is not on this map. Cited by 433 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Discomfort Assessment of Senographe Pristina Patient-assisted Versus Standard Compression Mode in Asymptomatic Adult Women Undergoing Screening Full-filled Digital Mammography and Quality Evaluation of Screening Mammograms
Who cites it
433 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Social Media and mHealth Technology for Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Effectiveness of clinical breast examination as a 'stand-alone' screening modality: an overview of systematic reviews.BMC cancer · 2020Pooled it
- How do women experience a false-positive test result from breast screening? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.British journal of cancer · 2019Pooled it
- Barriers and Facilitators to Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Immigrants in the United States.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2019Pooled it
- The breast cancer paradox: A systematic review of the association between area-level deprivation and breast cancer screening uptake in Europe.Cancer epidemiology · 2019Pooled it
- Primary care providers' cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review.Preventive medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Benefits and Harms of Screening Mammography by Comorbidity and Age: A Qualitative Synthesis of Observational Studies and Decision Analyses.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Screening Coverage Needed to Reduce Mortality from Prostate Cancer: A Living Systematic Review.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Trial
- Patient navigation for lung cancer screening in an urban safety-net system: Protocol for a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2017Trial
- Facilitating informed decisions about breast cancer screening: development and evaluation of a web-based decision aid for women in their 40s.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Trial
- Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2016Trial
- Decision aid on breast cancer screening reduces attendance rate: results of a large-scale, randomized, controlled study by the DECIDEO group.Oncotarget · 2016Trial
- Article
- Identification of Key Microbial Signatures Associated With Breast Cancer: Machine Learning-Based Approaches Using Gut Microbiome Data.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Partnership Driving Impact: An Integrated Women-Centric Model to Improve Early Detection and Treatment of Cervical and Breast Cancer in Ghana and India.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Factors Associated With Breast Self-Examination Among Female Healthcare Providers in Moshi Municipality, Northern Tanzania.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2026Article
373 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis systematic review is an update of evidence since the 2002 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation on breast cancer screening. PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of mammography screening in decreasing breast cancer mortality among average-risk women aged 40 to 49 years and 70 years or older, the effectiveness of clinical breast examination and breast self-examination, and the harms of screening. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through the fourth quarter of 2008), MEDLINE (January 2001 to December 2008), reference lists, and Web of Science searches for published studies and Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium for screening mammography data. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials with breast cancer mortality outcomes for screening effectiveness, and studies of various designs and multiple data sources for harms. DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant data were abstracted, and study quality was rated by using established criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Mammography screening reduces breast cancer mortality by 15% for women aged 39 to 49 years (relative risk, 0.85 [95% credible interval, 0.75 to 0.96]; 8 trials). Data are lacking for women aged 70 years or older. Radiation exposure from mammography is low. Patient adverse experiences are common and transient and do not affect screening practices. Estimates of overdiagnosis vary from 1% to 10%. Younger women have more false-positive mammography results and additional imaging but fewer biopsies than older women. Trials of clinical breast examination are ongoing; trials for breast self-examination showed no reductions in mortality but increases in benign biopsy results. LIMITATION: Studies of older women, digital mammography, and magnetic resonance imaging are lacking.
conclusionMammography screening reduces breast cancer mortality for women aged 39 to 69 years; data are insufficient for older women. False-positive mammography results and additional imaging are common. No benefit has been shown for clinical breast examination or breast self-examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.