Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19918216›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2009

Monitoring heart function in larval Drosophila melanogaster for physiological studies.

Ann S Cooper, Kylah E Rymond, Matthew A Ward, Easter L Bocook, Robin L Cooper

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Examining the effect of manganese on physiological processes: Invertebrate models.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Effects of Chloride Flux onMethods and protocols · 2019
    Article
  18. Conservation of cardiac L-type CaJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ann S CooperDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Kylah E Rymond
Matthew A Ward
Easter L Bocook
Robin L Cooper

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present various methods to record cardiac function in the larval Drosophila. The approaches allow heart rate to be measured in unrestrained and restrained whole larvae. For direct control of the environment around the heart another approach utilizes the dissected larvae and removal of the internal organs in order to bathe the heart in desired compounds. The exposed heart also allows membrane potentials to be monitored which can give insight of the ionic currents generated by the myocytes and for electrical conduction along the heart tube. These approaches have various advantages and disadvantages for future experiments that are discussed. The larval heart preparation provides an additional model besides the Drosophila skeletal NMJ to investigate the role of intracellular calcium regulation on cellular function. Learning more about the underlying ionic currents that shape the action potentials in myocytes in various species, one can hope to get a handle on the known ionic dysfunctions associated to specific genes responsible for various diseases in mammals.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophila melanogasterElectrodes, ImplantedHeartHeart RateLarvaMembrane PotentialsMonitoring, PhysiologicMyocytes, Cardiac

Identifiers

PMID19918216
PMCPMC3353715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.