Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19917835›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2009

Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification.

Charles M Balch, Jeffrey E Gershenwald, Seng-Jaw Soong, John F Thompson, Michael B Atkins, David R Byrd, Antonio C Buzaid, Alistair J Cochran, Daniel G Coit, Shouluan Ding and 10 more

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1,643 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,643citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01365182 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Improving Urinary Continence and Quality of Life in Prostate Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorCase Western Reserve UniversityRan2010 to 2014Enrolled279ConditionsUrinary IncontinenceArmsBF+SUPPORT, BF+PHONE
NCT01376713 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

CD20-Immunotargeting in Metastatic Melanoma Patients- A Prospective, Open Label, Sequential Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of ViennaRan2011 to 2015Enrolled10ConditionsStage III Melanoma, Stage IV MelanomaArmsOfatumumab, Ofatumumab plus Dacarbazine
NCT02036086 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study of the Neo-adjuvant Use of Vemurafenib Plus Cobimetinib (GDC-0973) in Patients With BRAF Mutant Melanoma With Palpable Lymph Node Metastases.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRan2015 to 2024Enrolled24ConditionsMelanomaArmsVemurafenib, Cobimetinib
NCT02583516 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Phase II Study of Vemurafenib Plus Cobimetinib Continuous Versus Intermittent, in Previously Untreated BRAFV600- Mutation Positive Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorGrupo Español Multidisciplinar de MelanomaRan2015 to 2019Enrolled70ConditionsMelanomaArmsvemurafenib and cobimetinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,643 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review of microsimulation models for skin cancer.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2025
    Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Neoadjuvant treatment for stage III and IV cutaneous melanoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Global Phase III Trial of Talimogene Laherparepvec Combined With Pembrolizumab for Advanced Melanoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Trial
  12. Review
  13. Exploring uncertainties in melanoma management: a Spanish multidisciplinary Delphi consensus.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Association BetweenDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  20. Geographic variation in the impact of novel melanoma therapies on mortality.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2026
    Article

1,583 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Charles M BalchDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Dermatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 N. Wolfe St, Osler 624, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. balchch@jhmi.edu
Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Seng-Jaw Soong
John F Thompson
Michael B Atkins
David R Byrd
Antonio C Buzaid
Alistair J Cochran
Daniel G Coit
Shouluan Ding
Alexander M Eggermont
Keith T Flaherty
Phyllis A Gimotty
John M Kirkwood
Kelly M McMasters
Martin C Mihm
Donald L Morton
Merrick I Ross
Arthur J Sober
Vernon K Sondak

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in MelanomaP50CA093459 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI GRIMM, ELIZABETH A · 2004 to 2014
$23.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NCI NIH HHS P50 CA093459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo revise the staging system for cutaneous melanoma on the basis of data from an expanded American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Melanoma Staging Database.

methodsThe melanoma staging recommendations were made on the basis of a multivariate analysis of 30,946 patients with stages I, II, and III melanoma and 7,972 patients with stage IV melanoma to revise and clarify TNM classifications and stage grouping criteria.

resultsFindings and new definitions include the following: (1) in patients with localized melanoma, tumor thickness, mitotic rate (histologically defined as mitoses/mm(2)), and ulceration were the most dominant prognostic factors. (2) Mitotic rate replaces level of invasion as a primary criterion for defining T1b melanomas. (3) Among the 3,307 patients with regional metastases, components that defined the N category were the number of metastatic nodes, tumor burden, and ulceration of the primary melanoma. (4) For staging purposes, all patients with microscopic nodal metastases, regardless of extent of tumor burden, are classified as stage III. Micrometastases detected by immunohistochemistry are specifically included. (5) On the basis of a multivariate analysis of patients with distant metastases, the two dominant components in defining the M category continue to be the site of distant metastases (nonvisceral v lung v all other visceral metastatic sites) and an elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level.

conclusionUsing an evidence-based approach, revisions to the AJCC melanoma staging system have been made that reflect our improved understanding of this disease. These revisions will be formally incorporated into the seventh edition (2009) of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and implemented by early 2010.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMaleMelanomaNeoplasm StagingSkin NeoplasmsSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID19917835
PMCPMC2793035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.