ArticleThe Journal of physiology2010
Ca(2+)-dependent components of inactivation of unitary cardiac L-type Ca(2+) channels.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-Channel Resolution of the Interaction between C-Terminal CaBiophysical journal · 2019Article
- Mechanisms of the cyclic nucleotide cross-talk signaling network in cardiac L-type calcium channel regulation.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2017Article
- Influence of pH on Ca²⁺ current and its control of electrical and Ca²⁺ signaling in ventricular myocytes.The Journal of general physiology · 2011Article
- Interplay of voltage and Ca-dependent inactivation of L-type Ca current.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2010Review
- Physiologic gating properties of unitary cardiac L-type Ca2+ channels.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2010Article
- Less is more, or enough is enough? Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation revisited.The Journal of physiology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A Ca(2+) ion-dependent inactivation (CDI) of L-type Ca(2+) channels (LCC) is vital in limiting and shaping local Ca(2+) ion signalling in a variety of excitable cell types. However, under physiological conditions the unitary LCC properties that underlie macroscopic inactivation are unclear. Towards this end, we have probed the gating kinetics of individual cardiac LCCs recorded with a physiological Ca(2+) ion concentration (2 mM) permeating the channel, and in the absence of channel agonists. Upon depolarization the ensemble-averaged LCC current decayed with a fast and a slow exponential component. We analysed the unitary behaviour responsible for this biphasic decay by means of a novel kinetic dissection of LCC gating parameters. We found that inactivation was caused by a rapid decrease in the frequency of LCC reopening, and a slower decline in mean open time of the LCC. In contrast, with barium ions permeating the channel ensemble-averaged currents displayed only a single, slow exponential decay and little time dependence of the LCC open time. Our results demonstrate that the fast and slow phases of macroscopic inactivation reflect the distinct time courses for the decline in the frequency of LCC reopening and the open dwell time, both of which are modulated by Ca(2+) influx. Analysis of the evolution of CDI in individual LCC episodes was employed to examine the stochastic nature of the underlying molecular switch, and revealed that influx on the order of a thousand Ca(2+) ions may be sufficient to trigger CDI. This is the first study to characterize both the unitary kinetics and the stoichiometry of CDI of LCCs with a physiological Ca(2+) concentration. These novel findings may provide a basis for understanding the mechanisms regulating unitary LCC gating, which is a pivotal element in the local control of Ca(2+)-dependent signalling processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.