Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19917240›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2009

Binding hot spots and amantadine orientation in the influenza a virus M2 proton channel.

Gwo-Yu Chuang, Dima Kozakov, Ryan Brenke, Dmitri Beglov, Frank Guarnieri, Sandor Vajda

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Why Some Targets Benefit from beyond Rule of Five Drugs.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Focused grid-based resampling for protein docking and mapping.Journal of computational chemistry · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Ligand deconstruction: Why some fragment binding positions are conserved and others are not.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. How proteins bind macrocycles.Nature chemical biology · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Structural basis for proton conduction and inhibition by the influenza M2 protein.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Analysis of protein binding sites by computational solvent mapping.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gwo-Yu ChuangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dima Kozakov
Ryan Brenke
Dmitri Beglov
Frank Guarnieri
Sandor Vajda
Boston University · US

Funding

Training CoreP42ES007381 · NIEHS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI HAHN, MARK E · 1995 to 2019
$46.1M
Computational mapping of proteins for the binding of ligandsR01GM064700 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI VAJDA, SANDOR · 2003 to 2015
$4.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES007381NIGMS NIH HHS GM064700NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structures of truncated versions of the influenza A virus M2 proton channel have been determined recently by x-ray crystallography in the open conformation of the channel, and by NMR in the closed state. The structures differ in the position of the bound inhibitors. The x-ray structure shows a single amantadine molecule in the middle of the channel, whereas in the NMR structure four drug molecules bind at the channel's outer surface. To study this controversy we applied computational solvent mapping, a technique developed for the identification of the most druggable binding hot spots of proteins. The method moves molecular probes--small organic molecules containing various functional groups--around the protein surface, finds favorable positions using empirical free energy functions, clusters the conformations, and ranks the clusters on the basis of the average free energy. The results of the mapping show that in both structures the primary hot spot is an internal cavity overlapping the amantadine binding site seen in the x-ray structure. However, both structures also have weaker hot spots at the exterior locations that bind rimantadine in the NMR structure, although these sites are partially due to the favorable interactions with the interfacial region of the lipid bilayer. As confirmed by docking calculations, the open channel binds amantadine at the more favorable internal site, in good agreement with the x-ray structure. In contrast, the NMR structure is based on a peptide/micelle construct that is able to accommodate the small molecular probes used for the mapping, but has a too narrow pore for the rimantadine to access the internal hot spot, and hence the drug can bind only at the exterior sites.

Indexed as

AmantadineAmino Acid SequenceAntiviral AgentsComputer SimulationCrystallography, X-RayInfluenza A virusLipid BilayersModels, ChemicalModels, MolecularNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationViral Matrix ProteinsViroporin ProteinsAmantadineAntiviral AgentsLipid BilayersM2 protein, Influenza A virusViral Matrix ProteinsViroporin Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19917240
PMCPMC2776279
OpenAlexW2098864163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.