Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19917121›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2009

Late preterm birth is a risk factor for growth faltering in early childhood: a cohort study.

Ina S Santos, Alicia Matijasevich, Marlos R Domingues, Aluísio J D Barros, Cesar G Victora, Fernando C Barros

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04807088 (Effect of Tactile-Kinesthetic Stimulation on Growth, Neurobehavior and Development Among Preterm Neonates), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04807088 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Tactile-Kinesthetic Stimulation on Growth, Neurobehavior and Development Among Preterm Neonates

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2015 to 2017Enrolled126ConditionsInfant, Premature, DiseasesArmsTactile-kinesthetic Stimulation, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ina S SantosPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Department of Social Medicine, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil. inasantos@uol.com.br
Alicia Matijasevich
Marlos R Domingues
Aluísio J D Barros
Cesar G Victora
Fernando C Barros
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversidade Católica de Pelotas · BR

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRates of preterm birth are increasing worldwide and this increase is mostly due to infants born between 34 and 36 weeks of gestational age, the so-called "late preterm" births. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of late preterm birth over growth outcomes, assessed when children were 12 and 24 months old.

methodsIn 2004, all births taking place in Pelotas (Southern Brazil) were recruited for a cohort study. Late preterm (34/0-36/6 weeks of gestational age) and term children (37/0-42/6 weeks) were compared in terms of weight-for-age, length-for-age and weight-for-length z-scores. Weight-for-age, length-for-age and weight-for-length z-scores below -2 were considered, respectively, underweight, stunting and wasting. Singleton newborns with adequate weight for gestational age at birth, successfully followed-up either at 12 or 24 months of age were analyzed and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals calculated through logistic regression.

results3285 births were included, 371 of whom were late preterm births (11.3%). At 12 months, prevalence of underweight, stunting and wasting were, respectively, 3.4, 8.7 and 1.1% among late preterm children, against 1.0, 3.4 and 0.3% among term children. At 24 months, correspondent values were 3.0, 7.2 and 0.8% against 0.8, 2.9 and 0.4%. Comparing with the term children, adjusted odds of being underweighted among late preterm children was 2.57 times higher (1.27; 5.23) at 12 months and 3.36 times higher (1.56; 7.23) at 24; of being stunted, 2.35 (1.49; 3.70) and 2.30 (1.40; 3.77); and of being wasted, 3.98 (1.07; 14.85) and 1.87 (0.50; 7.01). Weight gain from birth to 12 and 24 months was similar in late preterm and term children, whereas length gain was higher in the former group in both periods.

conclusionLate preterm children grow faster than children born at term, but they are at increased risk of underweight and stunting in the first two years of life. Failure to thrive in the first two years may put them at increased risk of future occurrences of serious morbidity in late childhood and of chronic disease development in adult life.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrazilChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGrowth DisordersHumansIncidenceInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornPregnancyPremature BirthPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID19917121
PMCPMC2780991
OpenAlexW2111500295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.