Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19916683›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2009

Loss of life years after a hip fracture.

Peter Vestergaard, Lars Rejnmark, Leif Mosekilde

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03116490 (The Comparative Effects of Regional or General Anesthesia on the Prognosis of Hip Fracture Surgery on Elderly Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03116490 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Comparative Effects of Regional or General Anesthesia on the Prognosis of Hip Fracture Surgery on Elderly Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorWenzhou Medical UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled600ConditionsPostoperative Complications, Postoperative MortalityArmsAnesthesia type
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. In-hospital mortality after hip fracture by treatment setting.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Analysis of the association between bisphosphonate treatment survival in Danish hip fracture patients-a nationwide register-based open cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2013
    Article
  13. Mortality rates after incident non-traumatic fractures in older men and women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter VestergaardDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. p-vest@post4.tele.dk
Lars Rejnmark
Leif Mosekilde

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with a hip fracture have a high mortality; however, it is not clear how large the loss of life-years is over an extended observation period. SUBJECTS AND

methodsThis was a cohort study involving all patients in Denmark who suffered a hip fracture between 1977 and 2001 (n = 169,145). The survival rate for these patients was compared to that for age- and sex-matched subjects without a hip fracture (n = 524,010).

resultsThere was a substantial degree of excess mortality, with a pronounced variation in age and sex. The absolute number of life-years lost compared to age-matched subjects without a hip fracture was larger in younger subjects than in older subjects (men aged 51-60 years lived 7.5 years less on average while men over 80 years of age lived 3 years less). Expressed as a percentage, however, older subjects had the largest relative loss of expected remaining years of life. Men < or = 50 years of age lost 18% of their expected remaining years of life, as opposed to men > 80 years of age who lost as much as 58% of their expected remaining years of life. In women, the trend was similar but less pronounced (27% loss in women < or = 50 years of age vs. 38% in women > 80 years of age).

interpretationA large proportion of the estimated remaining life is lost after a hip fracture, even in younger patients. Prevention may save life years, although not all of the years lost after a hip fracture may be due to the hip fracture per se.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHip FracturesHumansLife ExpectancyMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesSex FactorsSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID19916683
PMCPMC2823336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.