ArticleMycopathologia2010
In vitro susceptibility of Prototheca to pH and salt concentration.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recovery and Survival of Prototheca Microalgae During Wastewater Treatment Process.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Article
- Breaking the paradigm-Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- New approaches for risk assessment and management of bovine protothecosis.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prototheca sp. can assume high economic significance in the dairy industry and pose a potential risk for the public health. We investigated the in vitro susceptibility of Prototheca isolates retrieved from mastitic milk (P. zopfii and P. blaschkeae) to different pH buffers and salt concentrations using a microbroth assay adapted from the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Different pH buffer solutions ranging from pH 1 to pH 12 and different sodium chloride concentrations, 4.5, 9 and 18%, were tested. P. zopfii strains presented an optimal growth between pH 5 and 9, a complete growth inhibition at pH 3, and limited growth at pH 1 and 12, whereas P. blaschkeae strains showed higher susceptibility to all pH values except for pH 3 where it demonstrated a moderate growth when compared to P. zopfii strains. When salinity was incremented, P. blaschkeae was more resistant than P. zopfii, although a reduction in growth for all strains of Prototheca was observed. This study demonstrated differences in the in vitro susceptibilities of P. zopfii and P. blaschkeae to different pH and salt concentrations and intend to be a contribution on the understanding of some of the physiologic features that can be associated with the survival of these microalgae in the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19916055What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.