ReviewSurgical endoscopy2010
Appropriate management of common bile duct stones: a RAND Corporation/UCLA Appropriateness Method statistical analysis.
Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcystic management of choledocholithiasis: Outcomes, factors associated with bile duct injury and implications for surgical practice.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Cohort analysis of relevant factors for negative emotions during the perioperative period in choledocholithiasis patients treated with ERCP and the impact on prognosis.Gland surgery · 2023Article
- Management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis: Endoscopic and surgical approaches.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Cystic duct dilation through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for treatment of gallstones and choledocholithiasis: Six case reports and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Hem-o-lok clip found in the common bile duct 3 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and surgical exploration.The Journal of international medical research · 2019Article
- Current status and future perspective of laparoscopic surgery in hepatobiliary disease.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2016Review
- Results of treatment of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi by single-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2014Article
- Modern approach to cholecysto-choledocholithiasis.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2014Review
- State of the art in robotic hepatobiliary surgery.World journal of surgery · 2013Review
- [Robotic hepatobiliary and gastric surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2013Review
- Routine use of simultaneous laparoendoscopic approach in patients with confirmed gallbladder and bile duct stones: fit for laparoscopy fit for "rendezvous".World journal of surgery · 2013Article
- MRCP is not a cost-effective strategy in the management of silent common bile duct stones.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2013Article
- Robot-assisted common bile duct exploration as an option for complex choledocholithiasis.Surgical endoscopy · 2013Article
- Variation in the use of intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2012Article
- Management of Calculi in the Common Hepatic Duct and Accessory Right Hepatic Duct with T-Tube and C-Tube Drainage: A Case Report.Case reports in gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBile duct stones affect 10% of patients who undergo a cholecystectomy and therefore represent a major health problem. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, endoscopic sphincterotomy, and open surgical choledocholithotomy are the three available methods for dealing with choledocholithiasis. Though many trials and reviews have compared all three strategies, a list of indications for defined patient profiles is lacking.
methodsWe employed the RAND Corporation/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) to evaluate the three procedures for bile duct stone clearance. An expert panel judged appropriateness after a comprehensive bibliography review, a first-round private rating of 108 different clinical situations, a consensus meeting, and a second round of definitive rating. A list of indications for each procedure was statistically calculated.
resultsA consensus was reached for 41 indications (38%). The endoscopic approach was always appropriate for preoperatively diagnosed bile duct stones and inappropriate for patients with single intraoperative detected stones causing cholangitis and bile duct dilatation. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration was appropriate for preoperatively diagnosed choledocholithiasis if patients had not undergone a previous cholecystectomy and no signs of cholangitis were detected. The laparoscopic approach was also appropriate for intraoperatively incidentally detected stones, except for septic patients with poor performance status and multiple calculi. Laparoscopic bile duct clearance was judged inappropriate for septic patients with poor performance status and absence of bile duct dilatation. Open surgery was appropriate in all patients with intraoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and cholangitis and in septic patients with bile duct dilatation. There was no clinical situation in which open surgery was appropriate when bile duct stones were preoperatively diagnosed.
conclusionsThere is still uncertainty with respect to the management of choledocholithiasis, showing the need for further investigation. The RAM helps to elucidate appropriateness for the different treatment options in specific clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.