Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19915859›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2010

Optimization of high intensity interval exercise in coronary heart disease.

Thibaut Guiraud, Martin Juneau, Anil Nigam, Mathieu Gayda, Philippe Meyer, Said Mekary, François Paillard, Laurent Bosquet

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03840330 (Effects of High-intensity Interval Circuit Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03840330 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effects of High-intensity Interval Circuit Training (HIICT) on the Cardiovascular and Functional Parameters of Aged Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de AlmeriaRan2015 to 2016Enrolled54ConditionsAging, Healthy, Cardiovascular Risk Factor, Physical ActivityArmsExperimental: High-intensity interval training group, Experimental: Moderate-intensity interval training group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Bibliometric Analysis of High-Intensity Interval Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thibaut GuiraudCardiac Rehabilitation and Prevention Center (EPIC) of the Montreal Heart Institute, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Martin Juneau
Anil Nigam
Mathieu Gayda
Philippe Meyer
Said Mekary
François Paillard
Laurent Bosquet

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High intensity interval training has been shown to be more effective than moderate intensity continuous training for improving maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). However, no evidence supports the prescription of one specific protocol of high intensity interval exercise (HIIE) in this population. The purpose of this study was to compare the acute cardiopulmonary responses with four different single bouts of HIIE in order to identify the most optimal one in CHD patients. Nineteen stable CHD patients (17 males, 2 females, 65 +/- 8 years) performed four different bouts of HIIE, all with exercise phases at 100% of maximal aerobic power (MAP), but which varied in interval duration (15 s for mode A and B and 60 s for mode C and D) and type of recovery (0% of MAP for modes A and C and 50% of MAP for modes B and D). A passive recovery phase resulted in a longer time to exhaustion compared to an active recovery phase, irrespective of the duration of the exercise and recovery periods (15 or 60 s, p < 0.05). Time to exhaustion also tended to be higher with mode A relative to mode C (p = 0.06). Despite differences in time to exhaustion between modes, time spent at a high percentage of VO(2max) was similar between HIIE modes except for less time spent above 90 and 95% of VO(2max) for mode C when compared with modes B and D. When considering perceived exertion, patient comfort and time spent above 80% of VO(2max), mode A appeared to be the optimal HIIE session for these coronary patients.

Indexed as

AgedBlood PressureCalibrationCoronary DiseaseExerciseExercise TestExercise ToleranceFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygen ConsumptionPhysical EndurancePhysical ExertionRecovery of Function

Identifiers

PMID19915859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.