ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2009
Travellers' diarrhoea - pros and cons of different prophylactic measures.
Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vaccines for preventing enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) diarrhoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Article
- Travelers' Diarrhea: A Clinical Review.Recent patents on inflammation & allergy drug discovery · 2019Review
- Pathogen-induced secretory diarrhea and its prevention.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2016Review
- Clinical implications of enteroadherent Escherichia coli.Current gastroenterology reports · 2012Review
- Immunization in travel medicine.Primary care · 2011Review
- Statement on Older Travellers: Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2011Article
- Chemoprophylaxis of Tropical Infectious Diseases.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Travellers' diarrhoea is the most likely cause for disturbing travel arrangements. At an average, 30-40% of tourists are concerned, depending on the travel destination. Due to the high impact on the travellers' health this topic is still of utmost importance in travel medicine. A wide spectrum of enteropathogens can be accountable, with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli being the major causing pathogen among other bacteria, parasites and viruses. Here we discuss advantages and disadvantages of different prophylactic measures against travellers' diarrhoea. The effectiveness but also the relevance of hygiene education, vaccination and antibiotic or probiotic application will be discussed in the context of the travellers' different risk profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.