Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19915551›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2009

High-resolution analysis of DNA regulatory elements by synthetic saturation mutagenesis.

Rupali P Patwardhan, Choli Lee, Oren Litvin, David L Young, Dana Pe'er, Jay Shendure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 237 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
237citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

237 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Locus-Scale Massively Parallel Reporter Assays.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Massively parallel reporter assays forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. PoolParty: streamlined design of DNA sequence libraries in Python.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Crosstalk BetweenCancers · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Large-scale discovery of neural enhancers for cis-regulation therapies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

177 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rupali P PatwardhanDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. rpatward@u.washington.edu
Choli Lee
Oren Litvin
David L Young
Dana Pe'er
Jay Shendure

Funding

Molecular Tools for Genome PartitioningR21HG004749 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SHENDURE, JAY ASHOK · 2008 to 2009
$405k
NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG004749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a method that harnesses massively parallel DNA synthesis and sequencing for the high-throughput functional analysis of regulatory sequences at single-nucleotide resolution. As a proof of concept, we quantitatively assayed the effects of all possible single-nucleotide mutations for three bacteriophage promoters and three mammalian core promoters in a single experiment per promoter. The method may also serve as a rapid screening tool for regulatory element engineering in synthetic biology.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBase SequenceDNAMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesis, Site-DirectedRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalSequence Analysis, DNADNA

Identifiers

PMID19915551
PMCPMC2849652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.