Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19915454›Full record

Trial reportCritical care medicine2010

Efficacy and safety of quetiapine in critically ill patients with delirium: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study.

John W Devlin, Russel J Roberts, Jeffrey J Fong, Yoanna Skrobik, Richard R Riker, Nicholas S Hill, Tracey Robbins, Erik Garpestad

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 150 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
29.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01274819 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Dynamic Light Application to Prevent ICU Acquired Delirium

TypeinterventionalSponsorJeroen Bosch ZiekenhuisRan2011 to 2013Enrolled1,000ConditionsDelirium, ConfusionArmsDynamic Light
NCT02899156 phase4terminatednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Flumazenil on Hypoactive Delirium in the ICU: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, DavisRan2016 to 2019Enrolled22ConditionsHypoactive DeliriumArmsFlumazenil, Placebo
NCT03572257 phase2 / phase3withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial of Quetiapine as a Treatment for Delirium in Critically Ill Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical College of WisconsinRan2019 to 2020Enrolled0ConditionsDeliriumArmsQuetiapine, Placebo
NCT05085808 phase4withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2028, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Trazodone vs Quetiapine vs Placebo for the Treatment of ICU Delirium: A Randomized Controlled Trial (The TraQ Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2028 to 2030Enrolled0ConditionsDelirium, Morality, Quality of Life, PsychArmsTrazodone, Quetiapine, Placebo
NCT05307003 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Trazodone vs. Quetiapine for the Treatment of ICU Delirium: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2024 to 2024Enrolled10ConditionsDelirium, Delirium of Mixed Origin, Delirium, Sepsis Associated, Delirium in Old AgeArmsTrazodone, Quetiapine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 519 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Antipsychotics for treatment of delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

John W DevlinNortheastern University School of Pharmacy, Boston, MA, USA. j.devlin@neu.edu
Russel J Roberts
Jeffrey J Fong
Yoanna Skrobik
Richard R Riker
Nicholas S Hill
Tracey Robbins
Erik Garpestad
Northeastern University · USHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont · CAMaine Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of scheduled quetiapine to placebo for the treatment of delirium in critically ill patients requiring as-needed haloperidol.

designProspective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

settingThree academic medical centers. PATIENTS: Thirty-six adult intensive care unit patients with delirium (Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist score > or = 4), tolerating enteral nutrition, and without a complicating neurologic condition.

interventionsPatients were randomized to receive quetiapine 50 mg every 12 hrs or placebo. Quetiapine was increased every 24 hrs (50 to 100 to 150 to 200 mg every 12 hrs) if more than one dose of haloperidol was given in the previous 24 hrs. Study drug was continued until the intensive care unit team discontinued it because of delirium resolution, therapy > or = 10 days, or intensive care unit discharge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsBaseline characteristics were similar between the quetiapine (n = 18) and placebo (n = 18) groups. Quetiapine was associated with a shorter time to first resolution of delirium [1.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.5-3.0) vs. 4.5 days (IQR, 2.0-7.0; p =.001)], a reduced duration of delirium [36 (IQR, 12-87) vs. 120 hrs (IQR, 60-195; p =.006)], and less agitation (Sedation-Agitation Scale score > or = 5) [6 (IQR, 0-38) vs. 36 hrs (IQR, 11-66; p =.02)]. Whereas mortality (11% quetiapine vs. 17%) and intensive care unit length of stay (16 quetiapine vs. 16 days) were similar, subjects treated with quetiapine were more likely to be discharged home or to rehabilitation (89% quetiapine vs. 56%; p =.06). Subjects treated with quetiapine required fewer days of as-needed haloperidol [3 [(IQR, 2-4)] vs. 4 days (IQR, 3-8; p = .05)]. Whereas the incidence of QTc prolongation and extrapyramidal symptoms was similar between groups, more somnolence was observed with quetiapine (22% vs. 11%; p = .66).

conclusionsQuetiapine added to as-needed haloperidol results in faster delirium resolution, less agitation, and a greater rate of transfer to home or rehabilitation. Future studies should evaluate the effect of quetiapine on mortality, resource utilization, post-intensive care unit cognition, and dependency after discharge in a broader group of patients.

Indexed as

Critical CareAntipsychotic AgentsDeliriumDibenzothiazepinesDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHaloperidolHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesQuetiapine FumarateAntipsychotic AgentsDibenzothiazepinesHaloperidolQuetiapine Fumarate

Identifiers

PMID19915454
OpenAlexW2162528474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.