Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19914022›Full record

SynthesisPatient education and counseling2010

E-mail in patient-provider communication: a systematic review.

Jiali Ye, George Rust, Yvonne Fry-Johnson, Harry Strothers

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Patient education and counseling, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Patients' online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic review in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiali YeNational Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA. jye@msm.edu
George Rust
Yvonne Fry-Johnson
Harry Strothers

Funding

Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
Research Desogn and Biostatistics CoreU54MD007588 · NIMHD · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI KLEMENT, BRENDA · 2012 to 2018
$24.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007588
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review systematically the role of e-mails in patient-provider communication in terms of e-mail content, and perspectives of providers and patients on e-mail communication in health care.

methodsA systematic review of studies on e-mail communication between patients and health providers in regular health care published from 2000 to 2008.

resultsA total of 24 studies were included in the review. Among these studies, 21 studies examined e-mail communication between patients and providers, and three studies examined the e-mail communication between parents of patients in pediatric primary care and pediatricians. In the content analyses of e-mail messages, topics well represented were medical information exchange, medical condition or update, medication information, and subspecialty evaluation. A number of personal and institutional features were associated with the likelihood of e-mail use between patients and providers. While benefits of e-mails in enhancing communication were recognized by both patients and providers, concerns about confidentiality and security were also expressed.

conclusionThe e-mail is transforming the relationship between patients and providers. The rigorous exploration of pros and cons of electronic interaction in health care settings will help make e-mail communication a more powerful, mutually beneficial health care provision tool. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: It is important to develop an electronic communication system for the clinical practice that can address a range of concerns. More efforts need to be made to educate patients and providers to appropriately and effectively use e-mail for communication.

Indexed as

CommunicationElectronic MailPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsAttitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthHumans

Identifiers

PMID19914022
PMCPMC4127895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.