Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19913899›Full record

ReviewBrain and language2010

Genes and vocal learning.

Stephanie A White

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain and language, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Current Approaches and Applications in Avian Genome Editing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What bats have to say about speech and language.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. miR-9 and miR-140-5p target FoxP2 and are regulated as a function of the social context of singing behavior in zebra finches.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evo-devo, deep homology and FoxP2: implications for the evolution of speech and language.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2011
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie A WhiteDepartment of Physiological Science, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095, USA. sawhite@ucla.edu
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Formation and Function of Circuitry for Vocal LearningR01MH070712 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WHITE, STEPHANIE ANN · 2005 to 2017
$3.1M
Cntnap2 in a behavioral model of autismR21HD065271 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WHITE, STEPHANIE ANN · 2009 to 2010
$528k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD065271NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH070712NIMH NIH HHS R01MH070712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Could a mutation in a single gene be the evolutionary lynchpin supporting the development of human language? A rare mutation in the molecule known as FOXP2 discovered in a human family seemed to suggest so, and its sequence phylogeny reinforced a Chomskian view that language emerged wholesale in humans. Spurred by this discovery, research in primates, rodents and birds suggests that FoxP2 and other language-related genes are interactors in the neuromolecular networks that underlie subsystems of language, such symbolic understanding, vocal learning and theory of mind. The whole picture will only come together through comparative and integrative study into how the human language singularity evolved.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCritical Period, PsychologicalForkhead Transcription FactorsHumansLearningMutationSongbirdsSpeechTheory of MindVocalization, AnimalForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXP2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID19913899
PMCPMC2888939
OpenAlexW1967825101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.