Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19913612›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences2010

Transport of chitosan-DNA nanoparticles in human intestinal M-cell model versus normal intestinal enterocytes.

Irina Kadiyala, Yihua Loo, Krishnendu Roy, Janet Rice, Kam W Leong

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Application of Nanovaccines in Autoimmune Diseases.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Review
  4. Intestinal Peyer's Patches: Structure, Function, and In Vitro Modeling.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In Vitro Models of Biological Barriers for Nanomedical Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects of food-borne nanomaterials on gastrointestinal tissues and microbiota.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2018
    Review
  13. Role of nanoparticle size, shape and surface chemistry in oral drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Irina KadiyalaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Yihua Loo
Krishnendu Roy
Janet Rice
Kam W Leong

Funding

Oral Nonviral Gene Delivery for Hemophilla AR01HL089764 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LEONG, KAM W · 2008 to 2011
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL89764NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral vaccination is one of the most promising applications of polymeric nanoparticles. Using two different in vitro cellular models to partially reproduce the characteristics of intestinal enterocytes and M-cells, this study demonstrates that nanoparticle transport through the M-cell co-culture model is 5-fold that of the intestinal epithelial monolayer, with at least 80% of the chitosan-DNA nanoparticles uptaken in the first 30 min. Among the properties of nanoparticles studied, ligand decoration has the most dramatic effect on the transcytosis rate: transferrin modification enhances transport through both models by 3- to 5-fold. The stability of the nanoparticles also affects transport kinetics. Factors which de-stabilize the nanoparticles, such as low charge (N/P) ratio and addition of serum, result in aggregation and in turn decreases transport efficiency. Of these stability factors, luminal pH is of great interest as an increase in pH from 5.5 to 6.4 and 7.4 leads to a 3- and 10-fold drop in nanoparticle transport, respectively. Since soluble chitosan can act as an enhancer to increase paracellular transport by up to 60%, this decrease is partially attributed to the soluble chitosan precipitating near neutral pH. The implication that chitosan-DNA nanoparticles are more stable in the upper regions of the small intestine suggests that higher uptake rates may occur in the duodenum compared to the ileum and the colon.

Indexed as

Biological TransportCaco-2 CellsChitosanCoculture TechniquesDNADrug CarriersEnterocytesHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIntestinal AbsorptionLymphocytesModels, BiologicalNanoparticlesChitosanDNADrug Carriers

Identifiers

PMID19913612
PMCPMC2818464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.