Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19913573›Full record

ReviewBrain research reviews2010

The neuronal correlates of intranasal trigeminal function-an ALE meta-analysis of human functional brain imaging data.

Jessica Albrecht, Rainer Kopietz, Johannes Frasnelli, Martin Wiesmann, Thomas Hummel, Johan N Lundström

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Trigeminal function in patients with COVID-associated olfactory loss.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Migraine with aura: less control over pain and fragrances?The journal of headache and pain · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Functional Connectivity of the Chemosenses: A Review.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica AlbrechtMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. jalbrecht@monell.org <jalbrecht@monell.org>
Rainer Kopietz
Johannes Frasnelli
Martin Wiesmann
Thomas Hummel
Johan N Lundström

Funding

Odor Processing: Differences Determined by Origin of OdorantsR03DC009869 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI LUNDSTROM, JOHAN N · 2009 to 2011
$444k
NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC009869NIDCD NIH HHS R03DC009869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Almost every odor we encounter in daily life has the capacity to produce a trigeminal sensation. Surprisingly, few functional imaging studies exploring human neuronal correlates of intranasal trigeminal function exist, and results are to some degree inconsistent. We utilized activation likelihood estimation (ALE), a quantitative voxel-based meta-analysis tool, to analyze functional imaging data (fMRI/PET) following intranasal trigeminal stimulation with carbon dioxide (CO(2)), a stimulus known to exclusively activate the trigeminal system. Meta-analysis tools are able to identify activations common across studies, thereby enabling activation mapping with higher certainty. Activation foci of nine studies utilizing trigeminal stimulation were included in the meta-analysis. We found significant ALE scores, thus indicating consistent activation across studies, in the brainstem, ventrolateral posterior thalamic nucleus, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, precentral gyrus, as well as in primary and secondary somatosensory cortices-a network known for the processing of intranasal nociceptive stimuli. Significant ALE values were also observed in the piriform cortex, insula, and the orbitofrontal cortex, areas known to process chemosensory stimuli, and in association cortices. Additionally, the trigeminal ALE statistics were directly compared with ALE statistics originating from olfactory stimulation, demonstrating considerable overlap in activation. In conclusion, the results of this meta-analysis map the human neuronal correlates of intranasal trigeminal stimulation with high statistical certainty and demonstrate that the cortical areas recruited during the processing of intranasal CO(2) stimuli include those outside traditional trigeminal areas. Moreover, through illustrations of the considerable overlap between brain areas that process trigeminal and olfactory information; these results demonstrate the interconnectivity of flavor processing.

Indexed as

Brain MappingMeta-Analysis as TopicOdorantsBrainHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, NeurologicalOlfactory PathwaysPositron-Emission TomographyTrigeminal Nuclei

Identifiers

PMID19913573
PMCPMC2822005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.