Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19912170›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2010

Pairwise variable selection for high-dimensional model-based clustering.

Jian Guo, Elizaveta Levina, George Michailidis, Ji Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Regression Trees With Fused Leaves.Statistics in medicine · 2024
    Article
  2. Heterogeneous Functional Regression for Subgroup Analysis.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Nonparametric prediction distribution from resolution-wise regression with heterogeneous data.Journal of business & economic statistics : a publication of the American Statistical Association · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Identifying Heterogeneous Effect using Latent Supervised Clustering with Adaptive Fusion.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2021
    Article
  7. Clustering High-Dimensional Landmark-based Two-dimensional Shape DataJournal of the American Statistical Association · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Integrative clustering methods for multi-omics data.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jian GuoDepartment of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Elizaveta Levina
George Michailidis
Ji Zhu

Funding

UNDERSTANDING THE PATHOGENESIS OF CAMPYLOBACTER JEJUNIP41RR018627 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FINLEY, RUSSELL L · 2003 to 2007
$12.4M
Sparse Structure Identification from High-Dimensional Epigenomic DataR01GM096194 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHU, JI · 2010 to 2013
$1.0M
NCRR NIH HHS 5P 41RR018627NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR018627NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM096194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variable selection for clustering is an important and challenging problem in high-dimensional data analysis. Existing variable selection methods for model-based clustering select informative variables in a "one-in-all-out" manner; that is, a variable is selected if at least one pair of clusters is separable by this variable and removed if it cannot separate any of the clusters. In many applications, however, it is of interest to further establish exactly which clusters are separable by each informative variable. To address this question, we propose a pairwise variable selection method for high-dimensional model-based clustering. The method is based on a new pairwise penalty. Results on simulated and real data show that the new method performs better than alternative approaches that use ℓ(1) and ℓ(∞) penalties and offers better interpretation.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisData Interpretation, StatisticalComputer SimulationModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID19912170
PMCPMC2888949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.