ReviewDrugs2009
Valsartan: more than a decade of experience.
Review in Drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of valsartan combined with α-lipoic acid on renal function in patients with diabetic nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2021Pooled it
- A Critical Review of Nebivolol and its Fixed-Dose Combinations in the Treatment of Hypertension.Drugs · 2018Pooled it
- Real-world effectiveness of valsartan on hypertension and total cardiovascular risk: review and implications of a translational research program.Vascular health and risk management · 2011Pooled it
- Valsartan Versus Amlodipine Effect on Left Ventricular Multidirectional Deformation and Adipocytokines Levels in Hypertensive Patients: Speckle Tracking Echocardiography.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Additivity of nebivolol/valsartan single-pill combinations versus other single-pill combinations for hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018Trial
- Nanoformulation of valsartan-loaded tablet attenuates L-NAME-induced hypertension: role of Nrf2/PPARγ/AT1 signaling pathway.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Identifying potential drug targets for postoperative abdominal wall hernia using Mendelian randomization: a multi-omics study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Engineered C-N Lyases for Stereoselective Synthesis of Tertiary Amines.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- A perspective on small molecules targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and their utility in cardiovascular diseases: exploring the structural insights for rational drug discovery and development.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Drug Repurposing as an Effective Drug Discovery Strategy: A Critical Review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
- A Natural Small Molecule Mitigates Kidney Fibrosis by Targeting Cdc42-mediated GSK-3β/β-catenin Signaling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Impact of angiotensin receptor blocker product recalls on antihypertensive prescribing in Germany.Journal of human hypertension · 2021Article
- The Protective Effects of Compound 21 and Valsartan in Isoproterenol-Induced Myocardial Injury in Rats.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2021Article
- Impact of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Patient Outcomes in Heart Failure: Evidence to Date.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2020Review
- Rationale for nebivolol/valsartan combination for hypertension: review of preclinical and clinical data.Journal of hypertension · 2017Review
- The effects of valsartan on renal glutathione peroxidase expression in alleviation of cyclosporine nephrotoxicity in rats.BioImpacts : BI · 2016Article
- In vitro and in vivo postmarketing surveillance of valsartan, alone or in combination with amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide, among Palestinian hypertensive patients.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2016Article
- The comparative efficacy and safety of the angiotensin receptor blockers in the management of hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases.Drug safety · 2015Review
- Aliskiren and valsartan mediate left ventricular remodeling post-myocardial infarction in mice through MMP-9 effects.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Valsartan is a nonpeptide angiotensin receptor antagonist that selectively blocks the binding of angiotensin II to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor. The efficacy, tolerability and safety of valsartan have been demonstrated in large-scale studies in hypertension, heart failure (HF) and post-myocardial infarction (MI). This review focuses on what was learned from the valsartan clinical research programme and other comparative trials published from 1997 to the present. Many studies have demonstrated the efficacy of valsartan in lowering blood pressure (BP) in a variety of patient populations (including elderly, women, children, obese patients, patients with diabetes mellitus, patients with chronic kidney disease [CKD], patients at high risk of cardiovascular [CV] disease, African Americans, Hispanic Americans and Asians) and in improving outcomes in CV disease and CKD. In hypertension, valsartan exhibits dose-dependent efficacy in reducing both systolic and diastolic BP over the once-daily dose range of 80-320 mg; doses as high as 640 mg/day have been studied and found to be efficacious and safe. BP control can be enhanced with a more consistent 24-hour BP-lowering profile by using single-pill, fixed-dose combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). The cardioprotective benefits of valsartan have been demonstrated in large-scale outcome trials and include significant reductions in CV morbidity and mortality in HF, following MI, and in patients with co-morbid hypertension and coronary artery disease and/or HF; reductions in HF hospitalizations; and reductions in the incidence of stroke. The magnitude of these effects is comparable with that demonstrated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors; however, valsartan has a more favourable tolerability profile, with a significantly lower incidence of cough and only rare reports of angio-oedema, both class effects of ACE inhibitor use. Consistent with its angiotensin receptor-blocking effects, valsartan also reduces circulating levels of biochemical markers that are associated with angiotensin II-mediated endothelial dysfunction and CV risk (e.g. high-sensitivity C-reactive protein or oxidized low-density lipoprotein). Improvements in CKD with valsartan include statistically and clinically meaningful reductions in urinary albumin and protein excretion in patients with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic patients with CKD. In short-term studies, valsartan has improved or stabilized various indices of metabolic function in at-risk patients, including those with co-morbid hypertension, obesity and/or metabolic syndrome. Because of this, valsartan is being prospectively investigated for its ability to reduce the incidence of new-onset diabetes and provide cardioprotection in patients with impaired glucose tolerance. Valsartan and valsartan/HCTZ are well tolerated. In clinical trials, adverse events during valsartan treatment were similar to those occurring with placebo. The combination of valsartan/HCTZ was better tolerated than HCTZ alone. Valsartan is administered once daily for hypertension; doses are usually taken upon awakening. In patients with HF or MI, valsartan is administered twice daily.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.