ReviewSurgical endoscopy2010
Opportunity cost in the evaluation of surgical innovations: a case study of laparoscopic versus open colectomy.
Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-utility analysis comparing laparoscopic vs open aortobifemoral bypass surgery.Vascular health and risk management · 2017Trial
- Does "Two is Better Than One" Apply to Surgeons? Comparing Single-Surgeon Versus Co-surgeon Bilateral Mastectomies.Annals of surgical oncology · 2016Trial
- Impact of a Task-Grabbing System for surgical technicians on operating room efficiency.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Offering No-Cost Cosmetic Revisions: The Experience of an Academic Cosmetic Surgery Program.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2023Article
- Bilateral mastectomies: can a co-surgeon technique offer improvements over the single-surgeon method?Breast cancer research and treatment · 2018Article
- Estimating the opportunity costs of bed-days.Health economics · 2018Article
- Comparing Outcomes between Antibody Induction Therapies in Kidney Transplantation.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2017Article
- Time Savings and Surgery Task Load Reduction in Open Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Fixation Procedure.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2015Article
- MIS in the management of colon and rectal cancer: consensus meeting of the Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada.Surgical endoscopy · 2013Article
- Evaluation of ECHO PS Positioning System in a Porcine Model of Simulated Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair.ISRN surgery · 2013Article
- Medical and financial risks associated with surgery in the elderly obese.Annals of surgery · 2012Article
- Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective piecewise linear regression analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Article
- Cost-effectiveness analyses of laparoscopic versus open surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Article
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Is It Time to Change Our Strategy Regarding Laparoscopic Colectomy?In vivo (Athens, Greece)Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOpportunity cost is the value of an activity forgone for participation in some other activity. With respect to surgery, an innovation incurs an opportunity cost when it uses additional operating time that could otherwise be used in a productive way. This report describes an example of assessing opportunity cost in the transition from open to laparoscopic colectomy using pooled analysis data from the surgical literature and hospital financial data.
methodsA MEDLINE literature search was performed between the years 1998 and 2008. Data were pooled from the identified studies used for the statistical analysis of cost and operating room time differences between laparoscopic versus open colectomy. The analysis identified five commonly performed, elective general surgery procedures. The profit margins of these procedures then were determined and divided by their average surgical time to calculate a range of opportunity cost multipliers. Finally, these opportunity cost multipliers were applied to the additional time required for performance of laparoscopic colectomy to demonstrate that procedure's true overall cost.
resultsSeven comparative studies were identified. The pooled analysis showed that the operating time was longer for a laparoscopic colectomy by 27.08 min (p < 0.0001). Additionally, laparoscopic colectomies had slightly higher total costs ($104.67 difference), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.28). The five commonly performed, elective procedures chosen were laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, breast biopsy, partial mastectomy, and total thyroidectomy, and their opportunity cost multipliers ranged from $9 to $26 per minute. Depending on the opportunity cost multiplier used, the opportunity cost of an additional 27.08 min required to perform laparoscopic colectomy ranges from $243.72 to $704.08, which is approximately two to six times greater than the point estimate of the difference in total costs based on published studies.
conclusionsAlthough frequently overlooked, opportunity cost is a potentially very important element in assessing the true costs of surgical innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19911224What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.