ArticlePLoS computational biology2009
A threading-based method for the prediction of DNA-binding proteins with application to the human genome.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNAreader: accurate prediction of DNA-binding residues in structured and disordered proteins using transformers and contrastive learning.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- DRBP-EDP: classification of DNA-binding proteins and RNA-binding proteins using ESM-2 and dual-path neural network.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Twenty years of advances in prediction of nucleic acid-binding residues in protein sequences.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- A comprehensive review of protein-centric predictors for biomolecular interactions: from proteins to nucleic acids and beyond.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- HybridDBRpred: improved sequence-based prediction of DNA-binding amino acids using annotations from structured complexes and disordered proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- ULDNA: integrating unsupervised multi-source language models with LSTM-attention network for high-accuracy protein-DNA binding site prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- IDPsBind: a repository of binding sites for intrinsically disordered proteins complexes with known 3D structures.BMC molecular and cell biology · 2022Article
- Protein-RNA interaction prediction with deep learning: structure matters.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Hybrid_DBP: Prediction of DNA-binding proteins using hybrid features and convolutional neural networks.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Comparative Analysis on Alignment-Based and Pretrained Feature Representations for the Identification of DNA-Binding Proteins.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- UMAP-DBP: An Improved DNA-Binding Proteins Prediction Method Based on Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection.The protein journal · 2021Article
- Predicting Hot Spot Residues at Protein-DNA Binding Interfaces Based on Sequence Information.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2021Article
- DP-BINDER: machine learning model for prediction of DNA-binding proteins by fusing evolutionary and physicochemical information.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2019Article
- DNA-protein interaction: identification, prediction and data analysis.Molecular biology reports · 2019Review
- iDNAProt-ES: Identification of DNA-binding Proteins Using Evolutionary and Structural Features.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Improved detection of DNA-binding proteins via compression technology on PSSM information.PloS one · 2017Article
- HOMCOS: an updated server to search and model complex 3D structures.Journal of structural and functional genomics · 2016Article
- Identification of DNA-binding proteins using multi-features fusion and binary firefly optimization algorithm.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- BindUP: a web server for non-homology-based prediction of DNA and RNA binding proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- How special is the biochemical function of native proteins?F1000Research · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diverse mechanisms for DNA-protein recognition have been elucidated in numerous atomic complex structures from various protein families. These structural data provide an invaluable knowledge base not only for understanding DNA-protein interactions, but also for developing specialized methods that predict the DNA-binding function from protein structure. While such methods are useful, a major limitation is that they require an experimental structure of the target as input. To overcome this obstacle, we develop a threading-based method, DNA-Binding-Domain-Threader (DBD-Threader), for the prediction of DNA-binding domains and associated DNA-binding protein residues. Our method, which uses a template library composed of DNA-protein complex structures, requires only the target protein's sequence. In our approach, fold similarity and DNA-binding propensity are employed as two functional discriminating properties. In benchmark tests on 179 DNA-binding and 3,797 non-DNA-binding proteins, using templates whose sequence identity is less than 30% to the target, DBD-Threader achieves a sensitivity/precision of 56%/86%. This performance is considerably better than the standard sequence comparison method PSI-BLAST and is comparable to DBD-Hunter, which requires an experimental structure as input. Moreover, for over 70% of predicted DNA-binding domains, the backbone Root Mean Square Deviations (RMSDs) of the top-ranked structural models are within 6.5 A of their experimental structures, with their associated DNA-binding sites identified at satisfactory accuracy. Additionally, DBD-Threader correctly assigned the SCOP superfamily for most predicted domains. To demonstrate that DBD-Threader is useful for automatic function annotation on a large-scale, DBD-Threader was applied to 18,631 protein sequences from the human genome; 1,654 proteins are predicted to have DNA-binding function. Comparison with existing Gene Ontology (GO) annotations suggests that approximately 30% of our predictions are new. Finally, we present some interesting predictions in detail. In particular, it is estimated that approximately 20% of classic zinc finger domains play a functional role not related to direct DNA-binding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.