Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19911048›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2009

A threading-based method for the prediction of DNA-binding proteins with application to the human genome.

Mu Gao, Jeffrey Skolnick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Predicting Hot Spot Residues at Protein-DNA Binding Interfaces Based on Sequence Information.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. HOMCOS: an updated server to search and model complex 3D structures.Journal of structural and functional genomics · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mu GaoCenter for the Study of Systems Biology, School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jeffrey Skolnick

Funding

THEORY OF FOLDING TRANSITIONS IN A-HELICAL PROTEINSR01GM037408 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SKOLNICK, JEFFREY · 1987 to 2014
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-37408NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diverse mechanisms for DNA-protein recognition have been elucidated in numerous atomic complex structures from various protein families. These structural data provide an invaluable knowledge base not only for understanding DNA-protein interactions, but also for developing specialized methods that predict the DNA-binding function from protein structure. While such methods are useful, a major limitation is that they require an experimental structure of the target as input. To overcome this obstacle, we develop a threading-based method, DNA-Binding-Domain-Threader (DBD-Threader), for the prediction of DNA-binding domains and associated DNA-binding protein residues. Our method, which uses a template library composed of DNA-protein complex structures, requires only the target protein's sequence. In our approach, fold similarity and DNA-binding propensity are employed as two functional discriminating properties. In benchmark tests on 179 DNA-binding and 3,797 non-DNA-binding proteins, using templates whose sequence identity is less than 30% to the target, DBD-Threader achieves a sensitivity/precision of 56%/86%. This performance is considerably better than the standard sequence comparison method PSI-BLAST and is comparable to DBD-Hunter, which requires an experimental structure as input. Moreover, for over 70% of predicted DNA-binding domains, the backbone Root Mean Square Deviations (RMSDs) of the top-ranked structural models are within 6.5 A of their experimental structures, with their associated DNA-binding sites identified at satisfactory accuracy. Additionally, DBD-Threader correctly assigned the SCOP superfamily for most predicted domains. To demonstrate that DBD-Threader is useful for automatic function annotation on a large-scale, DBD-Threader was applied to 18,631 protein sequences from the human genome; 1,654 proteins are predicted to have DNA-binding function. Comparison with existing Gene Ontology (GO) annotations suggests that approximately 30% of our predictions are new. Finally, we present some interesting predictions in detail. In particular, it is estimated that approximately 20% of classic zinc finger domains play a functional role not related to direct DNA-binding.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanAnimalsComputational BiologyData Interpretation, StatisticalDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterGenesHumansModels, MolecularProtein BindingSequence Analysis, ProteinDNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19911048
PMCPMC2770119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.