Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19910091›Full record

ReviewBlood reviews2010

Autologous blood cell therapies from pluripotent stem cells.

Claudia Lengerke, George Q Daley

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Claudia LengerkeDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Tuebingen Medical Center II, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany. claudia.lengerke@med.uni-tuebingen.de
George Q Daley
Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center · USUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

NIH Director's Pioneer Award (RMI)DP1OD000256 · OD · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI DALEY, GEORGE Q · 2004 to 2008
$4.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIH HHS DP1 OD000256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) raised promises for a universal resource for cell based therapies in regenerative medicine. Recently, fast-paced progress has been made towards the generation of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) amenable for clinical applications, culminating in reprogramming of adult somatic cells to autologous PSCs that can be indefinitely expanded in vitro. However, besides the efficient generation of bona fide, clinically safe PSCs (e.g., without the use of oncoproteins and gene transfer based on viruses inserting randomly into the genome), a major challenge in the field remains how to efficiently differentiate PSCs to specific lineages and how to select cells that will function normally upon transplantation in adults. In this review, we analyse the in vitro differentiation potential of PSCs to the hematopoietic lineage by discussing blood cell types that can be currently obtained, limitations in derivation of adult-type HSCs and prospects for clinical application of PSCs-derived blood cells.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingCell DifferentiationCell LineageHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansPluripotent Stem CellsTransplantation, Autologous

Identifiers

PMID19910091
PMCPMC2913579
OpenAlexW2006386075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.