Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19909347›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2010

Common trends in mutualism revealed by model associations between invertebrates and bacteria.

John Chaston, Heidi Goodrich-Blair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Is it time to assignApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Molecular Regulators of Entomopathogenic Nematode-Bacterial Symbiosis.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Selective Autophagy and Xenophagy in Infection and Disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John ChastonDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Heidi Goodrich-Blair

Funding

Microbial Pathogenesis &Host Responses Training ProgramT32AI055397 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KLEIN, BRUCE STEVEN · 2003 to 2024
$5.5M
Molecular mechanisms of X. nematophila-nematode interactionR01GM059776 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GOODRICH-BLAIR, HEIDI · 1999 to 2007
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS AI55397NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI055397NIGMS NIH HHS GM59776NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutually beneficial interactions between microorganisms and animals are a conserved and ubiquitous feature of biotic systems. In many instances animals, including humans, are dependent on their microbial associates for nutrition, defense, or development. To maintain these vital relationships, animals have evolved processes that ensure faithful transmission of specific microbial symbionts between generations. Elucidating mechanisms of transmission and symbiont specificity has been aided by the study of experimentally tractable invertebrate animals with diverse and highly evolved associations with microorganisms. Here, we review several invertebrate model systems that contribute to our current understanding of symbiont transmission, recognition, and specificity. Although the details of transmission and symbiont selection vary among associations, comparisons of diverse mutualistic associations are revealing a number of common themes, including restriction of symbiont diversity during transmission and glycan-lectin interactions during partner selection and recruitment.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaModels, BiologicalSymbiosisAnimalsBacteriaInvertebratesSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID19909347
PMCPMC2794943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.