Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19908161›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2010

Signal density of left ventricular myocardial segments and impact of beam hardening artifact: implications for myocardial perfusion assessment by multidetector CT coronary angiography.

Gastón A Rodríguez-Granillo, Miguel A Rosales, Elina Degrossi, Alfredo E Rodriguez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Computed tomography calls out nuclear imaging in its field: It doesn't matter how you are searching but what you are looking for.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  3. CT Role in the Assessment of Existence of Breast Cancerous Cells.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Myocardial computed tomography perfusion.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2017
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Update on Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.Current cardiovascular imaging reports · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Myocardial perfusion imaging with cardiac computed tomography: state of the art.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gastón A Rodríguez-GranilloDepartment of Cardiovascular Imaging, Otamendi Hospital, Azcuenaga 870 (C1115AAB), Buenos Aires, Argentina. grodriguezgranillo@gmail.com
Miguel A Rosales
Elina Degrossi
Alfredo E Rodriguez
Sanatorio Otamendi y Miroli · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWe sought to explore the normal myocardial signal density (SD) levels during multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography (MDCT-CA) acquisitions and evaluated the impact of beam hardening artifacts.

backgroundSince myocardial perfusion by MDCT is based on the myocardial signal density (SD), it is pivotal to determine the normal values of myocardial SD and to identify potential mechanisms of misinterpretation of perfusion defects. In routine MDCT acquisitions, we commonly visualize a considerable SD drop at the posterobasal wall resembling perfusion defects, being attributed to beam hardening artifacts. Consecutive asymptomatic patients without history of coronary artery disease (CAD) and low probability of CAD who were referred for MDCT evaluation at our institution due to inconclusive or discordant functional tests constituted the study population. Perfusion defects were defined as a myocardial segment having a SD two standard deviations below the average myocardial SD for the 16 left ventricular American Heart Association (AHA) segments. Thirty six asymptomatic patients constituted the study population. Myocardial SD was evaluated in 576 American Heart Association (AHA) segments and 36 posterobasal segments. The mean myocardial SD at the posterobasal segment was 53.5 +/- 35.1 HU, whereas the mean myocardial SD at the basal, mid and apical myocardium was 97.4 +/- 17.3, with significant differences (p < 0.001) between posterobasal and all AHA segments. Posterobasal "perfusion defects" were identified in 26 (72%) patients. The only variable associated to the presence of posterobasal SD deficit was the heart rate (61.8 +/- 6.2 bpm vs. 56.3 +/- 8.1 bpm, p = 0.04), whereas body mass index, blood SD of the left and right ventricles, contrast-to-noise ratio, and the extent of atherosclerosis were not related to the presence of "perfusion defects". In an asymptomatic population with no history of coronary artery disease, a myocardial signal density deficit mimicking a perfusion defect is a common finding in the posterobasal wall and is not related to body mass index or scan quality.

Indexed as

ArtifactsCoronary AngiographyCoronary CirculationTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHeart VentriclesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPredictive Value of TestsReference Values

Identifiers

PMID19908161
OpenAlexW2079003302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.